Talk:Virginia Abernethy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

[edit] Example

Example of Fertility-opportunity hypothesis
Following table from the United Nations. Notice total people undernourished without China (China does not follow FOH due to it's one-child policy)

Region/Subregion
Total Population (in millions)
Per Capita Dietary Energy Supply (kcal/day)
Number of people undernourished
Percent undernourished
in total population
1990-92 1997-99 1990-92 1997-99 1990-92 1997-99 1990-92 1997-99
DEVELOPING WORLD 4,050.0 4,5655 2,540 2,680 816.3 777.2 20 17
DEVELOPING WORLD
excluding China
2,8805 3,311.7 no data no data 623.7 660.9 22 20

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2001. Food Insecurity: When People Live With Hunger and Fear Starvation. The State of Food insecurity in the World 2001. Italy: FAO.
Fair use

[edit] Discussion

I moved this from the article to here for discussion because this appears to me to be original research. If we need an example we should derive one from her work, not find one on our own. -Will Beback 19:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

I told you i found this on the net. Real science uses references whereever they occur to find the truth. Unless of course you are trying to hide the truth. How is Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2001. Food Insecurity: When People Live With Hunger and Fear Starvation. The State of Food insecurity in the World 2001. Italy: FAO.orginal research??? it's published on the net! I request some sort of outside review. I think your move was biased.
Lee Wells 11:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

If you assembled this data on your own, and decided to exclude China on your own, then it is original research. There's nothing wrong with giving an example of a researcher's theory, but we should use one of her examples, not one that we create ourselves. We aren't here to prove or dispove this stheory, simply to describe it. The "truth" is not our aim here. Rather, we are trying to summarize verifiable information without engaging in original research. You are welcome to ask other editors to review. An RfC would be the usual method. -Will Beback 20:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)