Talk:Vincent Ferrari
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
he is one ugly looking fella. why not mention it in the article? ~bob~
- Because that view is simply an opinion and is not a quantifiable fact that merits inclusion in an encyclopedia. Including the text "(repulsively looking American)" does not further the goals of an ancyclopedia article. --Matthew 08:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Why Do we need this Article anyway? as far as i konw he is not a significant figure in history. he is just one blogger who got pushed into the spotlight for his fifteen minutes. all i can say is "cancel the account" ..err article. 84.184.202.135 09:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Two reasons:
- There is no clear consensus as to what should be done with this article.
- It's a good example of customer service in modern times.
- If, at some later date, this article is no longer noteworthy, then maybe it'll be a good candidate for AfD. --UNHchabo 19:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- The incident, and hence the person it is connected to, is at present a notable event. The specific incident is many times used as an example of both bad customer service and unethical business practices. The "Ferrari Case" has at present almost become synonymous with customer care disasters in general and "A-O-Hell" in particular. So yes, at present the article is most definitely warranted. Whether unregistered "Bob" finds mr Ferrari attractive or not is, I trust you agree, definitely not something to enter into an encyclopedic article. Unless, of course, it is a notable, verifiable fact that unregistered "Bob" does not find mr Ferrari attractive. --Tirolion 09:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] a New York blogger
if a full-time plumber spends 1 hr a week posting to blog is it more accurate to say he a blogger or a plumber? unless vincent ferrari blogs full time his profesion - not his hobby - should be used to describe him. right now its just blogcruft. 72.36.251.234 06:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)