User talk:Victor Greenstreet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the user talk page of Victor Greenstreet

[edit] 88.105.40.36

Hello Victor Greenstreet. In response to your message, these edits [1] made by your friend, 88.105.40.36, were removed for being a clear violation of What Wikipedia is not Policy. The contributions made by 88.105.40.36 included: Travel Directions with unverfied information on traffic times, Opinions on which routes are more convenient, and other uncited material. All of these contributions were in violation of Wikipedia's Three Content-Governing Policies: No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability. Per Wikipedia Policy, Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, Wikipedia is not a directory, and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Because these contributions were violations I removed them and left a message in the edit summary explaining to your friend why his contributions were reverted and I also left a link referring him to the official policy. He the initiated an edit war refusing to have the content removed and insisted that the information is in no violation of a policy. This led me to copy and paste the entire section of the policy I referred him to on his talk page because I thought he failed to actually read through it the first time. Even after referring him to the policy twice now, your friend continued his edit war and re-added the content that was in question. The content he added in the first place was a violation of Wikipedia policy. Because of this, there is no need to suggest the removal of the content with other contributors of the article. Your friend assumed Bad Faith in my actions and believed them to be aggression towards "getting things my way". Not only were these contributions Violations of Wikipedia policy, but they were also Not Notable. The information could easily be accessible on the official website of Wembley Stadium. I hope this brief explanation helps clarify the situation. -- bulletproof ^3:16 01:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Discussion was removed for the reasons stated above. It was a discussion to add content that violates Wikipedia's Three Content-Governing Policies. Hope that clears it up. -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Steve Harvey.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Steve Harvey.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 22:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)