User talk:Vesa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] NO POINT OF VIEW BUT HISTORICAL FACTS
IT IS A HISTORICAL FACT THAT TUDJMAN WANTED CROATIA OUT KNOWING IT WILL CAUSE WAR AND THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED, THIS IS HISTORICAL FACT, IT STARTED WITH HIM, GROW UP!
[edit] Reply
Hi. Thanks for posting correctly on my discussion page. Yes, I was able to read your comments just fine, and I am replying here. Also, congratulation for joining the debate on the G. Reeves Project. And, congratulations for toning down the insults. These are signs of real progress. So let us continue. I would like to see you try to improve in these three areas:
- Again, please end comments with four tildes (~, the squiggly line created by holding down Shift and pressing Accent (`, the key at the uppler left of your keyboard)). Otherwise I do not know under which of your accounts to reply to.
- Again, please use just one account. Do not switch between Vesa and Projects. Pick one and stick to it.
- As a historian, you must surely realize that debate must be founded on verifiable source material, not mere assertions of fact. I have seen many assertions from you but, as yet, not one single reference to any book or other document. In future I will need this to continue debate. Surely at the Chicago Public Library you must have access to many documents.
You must work on these three things if you wish to continue this discussion. I know you can do it if you set your mind to it.
I am not an administrator. Don't worry too much if your format and language is not perfect, that can come later. I did not take down the George Reeves Project, someone else did that. It was taken down because the George Reeves Project is just you. Wikepedia only contains articles on large or notable groups. There are many, many, many internet forums and bulletin boards where you can post a link to your George Reeves Project page and a description of the project. Wikipedia is not one of them. Cheers, Herostratus 02:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Be glad
Can you give me your email, my time is very limited and I am hurt the way I was treated here and my and my associates' postings removed, i thought you are administrator, i mean so many things here we need to change and I want to proove my point on many of my changes, why they need changes, of course, i am not always right, but I know I am most of the time, as far as my bad spelling (sometimes) I really have to type fast, i am working on many srojects and newspaper articles and dont hve time, you should be glad I am here... I ALSO DONT APPRECIATE UNDER USER, WHERE I WRITE MY BIO, IDIOTS CONNECT ME WITH OTHER USERS AND PUPPETS, I DEMAND THIS IS TAKEN DOWN AND NOT RESTORED, ALSO HOW TO BLOCK OTHERS, WHATS THE CODE, HOW TO UNBLOCK AND HOW TO BRING BACK ORIGINAL ARTICLE FROM CERTAIN DATE...
[edit] Reply
Hello, Vesa. I am replying to your comments and requests that you wrote on my user discussion page (talk page), and other things.
- I was very pleased to see, on the Stalin discussion page (talk page) that you cited a source for your argument -- and a good one, Stalin's birth certificate.
- I am also pleased that you are leaving comments correctly, in the correct place, on my discussion page (talk page). (I'm sorry that I can't communicate with you by email, but I have stated my reasons for that earlier.) I was also pleased to see that you suggested, in cases of dispute, that we could note in the article if a fact is disputed. That's a good idea, and in fact is sometimes done in Wikipedia. Also, don't worry too much if your spelling and grammar is not 100% correct, it's OK.
- However, I am still having difficulty in other areas. I do not feel that you are making the progess that I had hoped for. I will not be able to communicate further with you unless you can show some improvement in these areas:
-
- Please log in, and under a single name, as I have asked repeatedly. I saw that you have edited pages recently without logging in. You should be able to log in at any terminal or computer. Ask the one of the librarians if you are having technical problems. Also, please do not pretend that your different accounts, Vesa, Projects, and so forth are different people. This is false.
- Please -- PLEASE! -- sign your name to your messages on talk pages. As I have said, you do this by typing four "tildes" at the end of the message, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically turn into your your user name. As I have said, to make a tilde press the Shift key and the Accent key at the same time (the Accent key is located at the upper left of your keyboard. If you are having trouble with this, ask one of the librarians to help you. Sorry, but I will not reply to any more unsigned messages.
- Once again, please do not call me an "idiot" or tell me to "grow up". This hurts my feelings. How would you like it if someone called you an idiot. I will not respond to any more messages that describe either me or other hard-working Wikipedia editors in such terms.
- I will now revert your user page to show the warning templates. If you are unhappy with this (and other things), there IS a group that you can turn to: it is the Association of Member Advocates. They are exactly what you are looking for, and they can help you get in touch with administrators. Click HERE and Edit the Requests for Assistance, and tell them your issues. I warn you, though, that when the administrators take notice of you you will probably be banned unless you can show RAPID and SUBSTANTIAL progress in the areas I have suggested, and more.
- Hoping you a good new year, Herostratus 19:08, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Franco
Hi Vesa. Was that you who edited the Franciso Franco article and changed the death date by one day? Why? You did not give an explanation or source. Herostratus 19:27, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Franco died on the 19th, all the historians agree, they made the date different for political purposes!
AND THE REST OF YOU STAY AWAY FROM OUR SITES AND DONT MIX ONE OF US WITH THE REST, GROW UP!
[edit] Whatever
Well, it was obvious heros and other vandal administrators simply did not want to correct few websites and all these things blew out of control, herostratus seemed nice, we observed, but underneath his goal was simply to be an administrator thru this dude, now what a lousy administrator he is. Of course, if you want to do good, when you do, nobody ever says anything about it.
