Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/India articles by quality/2

Revision assessed

This article is assessed as a start class article as the article primarily deals with the different IIMs only, and leaves a lot of important topics undiscussed. See IITs article for a recommended structure. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 07:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC) (edit comment)

While the article is longer than a stub, the content seriously lacks relevant information beyond the lead. Also, the relatively good lead section deceptively hides the inadequacy of the rest of the article on a first glance. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 12:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What is expected?

We need to implement the suggestions given at Talk:Languages of India#Cleanup and Talk:Languages of India#Going forward. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 12:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC) (edit comment)

Mayara ChittiBabu Kuruma. Hyderabad, A.P. (edit comment)

1. Need more in-depth discussion of his teaching, other than just quotations (most of which can be moved to wikiquotes) (edit comment)

It contains good quality prose, but lacks in quantity. More detailed prose is required, combined with references. The lead should be expanded as per WP:LEAD. The Career section should list her modelling as well as acting, with clear separation (subsections, anyone?). It should include some prose regarding mass as well as critical reception of both her acting as well as films (with references). The filmography et al lists can be condensed better (with the promo poster of her films, may be?)

Wish you all the best. --soum^সৌমোyasch 09:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC) (edit comment)

The only reason this article has been rated as "Start" is because it is lacking sources. Please, add sources. --NRS | ^T/_M\^B 14:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC) (edit comment)

--spacejuncky 04:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC) (edit comment)

This article has been rated as a start class article. The biggest problem with this article is that its list-heavy, and tone is very informal with "..and the list goes on..." types of sentences. If the lists are converted to usable prose, with little more commentary, it would be great. It has been rated as mid-importance because of the historical significance of the city. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC) (edit comment)

sumal 14:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re-evaluation

I have rated it as start class. There is hardly any information on her personal life, not much on other aspects of her career too. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC) (edit comment)

• Needs a infobox
• Intro needs cleanup. Please read Wikipedia:Lead section
• Some sections need expanding.

-- Ganeshk (talk) 00:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC) (edit comment)

• citation from reliable sources
• better layout with sub headings.
• wikification. e.g. avoid decorative words, italic fonts for Indian names, etc.
• putting internet link within article negatively affects, they should be provided in external link section, mentioning them in main body completely unnecessary
• lacks information about how a person uniquely identified of Barnwal when generic surnames such as Lal, Kumar, etc are used. (edit comment)

There is enough material and a photograph to mark it as a start class article, unless other assesors mark it higher up. -- P.K.Niyogi 07:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC) (edit comment)

• Needs pictures
• More expansion

Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 06:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC) (edit comment)

This article has been substantially expanded since it was rated as Start Class. The rating may please be reviewed. -- P.K.Niyogi 17:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC) (edit comment)