Talk:Versace
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
== Hi! I would really like it if you could find more info on Versace. I'm very interested in fashion and designers. If you know something about Versace that is not in this page, please edit it. Thanks! ==]]
Why don't you buy some stuff and learn about it. While you're doing that you can learn about Versace from the people who work in the Boutique.
The grammar in this article is atrocious 70.137.142.207 12:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] I attempted to clean-up this article...
While this article still needs some serious work, and plenty more citations, I attempted to fix some of the terrible grammar errors. If you plan on editing this article, pay special attention to the "Going Public" section. As it was worded by the former author, the meaning was messy and jumbled, and I could find no information to clarify the subject. Thanks --KristaCalla 15:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Author
Why would you want to deauthor me, seen as how I wrote most of it and my oh so shocking grammar! --Djkinsella 23:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Suitly emphazi, please. --Darkfred Talk to me 23:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
What is not to understand? I added to the article in depth a few months ago, but I'm no longer listed on the history page; does this mean I was removed as an author? If so, why? What an odd thing to do.--Djkinsella 22:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Trust me, you are still on the history page. Noone has removed you, in fact it is nearly impossible to remove a block of history. Only one or two people are authorized to do it. One or two people have complained about your grammar, but this is no problem, it was fixed quickly by a native english speaker. In fact if you would like help with grammar send me a message and I can proof read for you. --Darkfred Talk to me 23:33, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Were you perhaps accidentally checking the history of this discussion page, rather than the history of the main article page. Its a mistake I've made several times in the past and can be confusing. -- Solipsist 05:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah never mind! Perhaps I was, I just thought I'd done something really wrong and was removed because of it! One thing that irritates me at the moment with this is this "Persace" thing, I've never heard of it, someone keeps adding it. A Google search produces no evidence of validity. Thank you both for clarifying :-)--Djkinsella 13:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- The Persace thing appears to be completely invented bullshit from what I have researched. Even if it was true it wouldn't merit inclusion. Just because I collect cards doesn't mean i should be included in the card article. --Darkfred Talk to me 16:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Haha very true. Thank you again. Djkinsella 22:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- The Persace thing appears to be completely invented bullshit from what I have researched. Even if it was true it wouldn't merit inclusion. Just because I collect cards doesn't mean i should be included in the card article. --Darkfred Talk to me 16:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah never mind! Perhaps I was, I just thought I'd done something really wrong and was removed because of it! One thing that irritates me at the moment with this is this "Persace" thing, I've never heard of it, someone keeps adding it. A Google search produces no evidence of validity. Thank you both for clarifying :-)--Djkinsella 13:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Were you perhaps accidentally checking the history of this discussion page, rather than the history of the main article page. Its a mistake I've made several times in the past and can be confusing. -- Solipsist 05:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
I find your continual dismissals of the Persace issue very narrow minded. Simply because neither of you are aware of the Persace movement that does not mean that it doesn’t exist. Though admittedly you've gone through the foolproof avenue of Google to check its validity, because if something isn't on Google, then by default it doesn't exist. Persace is a cultural movement, spawned from one individual's horrific taste in Versace clothing. The term is widely recognised as slang for anything negative and I am shocked and annoyed that it is constantly being edited off this page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.9.72.247 (talk • contribs).
- Continue being shocked. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djkinsella (talk • contribs).
Ha-ha aren't you funny, still we'll see who's laughing at the end of the day, there is a team of people behind the Persace revolution. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.9.72.247 (talk • contribs).
-
- Currently, I am. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djkinsella (talk • contribs).
Tell me is it satisfying editing an online encyclopedia with no monetary benefits? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.9.72.247 (talk • contribs).
- Yep :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djkinsella (talk • contribs).
- Tell me mr. 84.9.72.247 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) is it satisfying to add hoaxes to an online encyclopedia with no monetary benefits? --Darkfred Talk to me 23:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Versace is the most famous design company in the world."
Where is this coming from? That needs to be taken off there unless you can provide some sort of basis.
[edit] Size Zero o muerte!
The Versace heir has severe anorexia and is in intensive care with bad outlook, at least some tabloid wrote that yesterday. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.131.210.162 (talk) 13:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC).