Talk:Venom (comics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Recreated talk page from redirect
Since we now have Venom (comics) and Venom (Eddie Brock) as two distinct articles, they should really have two different talk pages - no point in redirecting this to Talk:Venom (Eddie Brock), especially as that now complicates things such as comicsproj template settings. --Mrph 02:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
The first apperance is wrong... if you want it to be Eddie Brock when Venom was first called Venom that is Spider-Man 300. But if you are talking about the suit its first appearence was Secret Wars number 8... either way you want to do it what you have as a first appearce is wrong.
[edit] Spider-Man
He was never the original host for Venom since it wasn't called such until it left him. He shouldn't have an individual section here.Darkwarriorblake 20:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Man, D, can you anything other than complain? Anyway, it's part of the symbiote's history. I'll take another look but...gees. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 20:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I've barely been here in a month so I don't get what you're whining about. Darkwarriorblake 20:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Three words: Eddie...Brock...Junior. But whatever. You dont- er...it doesn't matter. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 21:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image
Someone change the top image. It is not common of Venom, find something more common and typical of the character.--Viridis 19:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- I just changed it; the most recent one looked like the Juggernaut. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 01:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not to nitpick, but that picture is the symbiote alone, and Venom would be the symbiote with a host, I think? That picture is used for Symbiote (comics), aswell. How about the one used for Venom (Eddie Brock)?--Viridis 02:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Television Synopsis
The Television section deserves to be commended for its level of detail (anyone reading it hardly needs to see the episodes now), but needs a great deal of work on its style. There seems to be missing words, lack of consensus on spelling, switching back and forth between past and present tenses (present is the correct choice) and long convoluted sentences that can be very difficult to follow. I just attempted an edit, but it is really a bigger job than I have time for now. Additionally, where it is ambiguous, I can't really help, not having seen the episodes in question.
A. Boisvert 12:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)amboisvert