Talk:Vaslav Nijinsky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (comments) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class. |
[edit] discussion of the article
Nijinsky was forced to be gay with Diaghlev or else he would have ended Nijinsky's career, i hope someone verifies that and make changes soon
As i am currently studying dance at Burton colluge i have been asked to write an essay about a male dancer, as part of an assignment. Therfore i choose Vaslav Nijinsky. I find him most facinating what he did with his life, and the huge effect he has on dancing nowadays. AS i am researching more into hoim i find him more interestiing every minute.
Nijinsky was NOT forced to be gay.....I dont know who put that statement up there but it is so far gone with ignorance its sick. Its almost funny. Accept it, the man WAS GAY! Mrlopez2681 05:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- The claim that he was forced to be Diaghilev's lover is made in the memoirs of Nijinsky's wife Romola. Whether she was correct (or should be trusted) is another matter, but the statement is not "so far gone with ignorance it's sick." In his diaries Nijinsky describes many encounters with female prostitutes in detail, but does not explicitly discuss male lovers. David Sneek 17:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Birth date and place
Hi all,
I've seen Nijinsky's tombstone in the cemetery in Paris and on it, it says that he was born in Kiev on December 28, 1889 (although this could be old style) and died on April 8, 1950 in London. The photo of the tombstone can be found here:
http://photos10.flickr.com/13625804_7000399d07_b.jpg
Max
- Interesting. It certainly isn't an old style/new style problem, since the old style equivalent of 12 March 1890 is 28 February 1890. And the new style equivalent of 28 December 1889 is 9 January 1890. It just seems to be a mistake (although it's possible that 28 December 1889 is both the wrong date and in the old style). I must do some research on this. Of course, this isn't the only case where a tombstone lists the wrong date/s for the person inside. Karol Szymanowski's sarcophagus shows the wrong death date (out by one day). JackofOz 01:45, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
[1] says that Nijinsky was born on the night of 27-28 February 1889 (= 12 March new style). Fifteen months later his mother became pregnant again, and his sister Bronislava was born 27 December 1890 (= 8 January 1891 new style). Even if the fifteen months is not accurate, it would be highly unlikely (although possible) for a mother to give birth to one child in March and another in the following January. The footnote on the page says:
- The birthdates of the Nijinsky children have been a subject of confusion in most biographies. The earliest, by Romola Nijinsky, has Vaslav born in 1890 while Richard Buckle’s Nijinsky erroneously gives Vaslav’s year of birth as 1888 in an attempt to correct previous inaccuracies. However, Vera Krassovskaya, the Soviet ballet historian, has the dates correct in her recent Nijinsky (1979).
On the basis of this document, it would seem to me more than likely that:
- Nijinsky was born on 12 March, but in 1889, not 1890, and
- the date 28 December on his tombstone is a confusion about his sister Bronislava's (old style) birth date of 27 December. JackofOz 02:08, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for following up on this. I am not too surprised with these issues, as dates can be hard to track down, especially across such frontiers and time frames. And it further depends on who placed the tombstone. mno 16:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
