Van der Pauw method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The van der Pauw Method is a commonly used technique, based around the Hall effect, which characterises a sample of semiconductor material and can be successfully completed with a current source and a voltmeter. Products are available to automatically perform this procedure; however they typically offer the ability to do so at a range of temperatures. This means that they need accurate cooling and heating systems, and thus are expensive.

From the measurements made, the following properties of the material can be calculated:

The sheet resistance, from which the resistivity can be inferred for a sample of a given thickness.
The doping type (i.e. if it is a P-type or N-type) material.
The sheet carrier density of the majority carrier (the number of majority carriers per unit area). From this, the density of the semiconductor, often known as the doping level, can be found for a sample with a given thickness.
The mobility of the majority carrier.

The method was first propounded by L.J. van der Pauw in 1958 .^[1]

1 Sample preparation
2 Measurement definitions
3 Resistivity measurements
4 Hall measurements
5 Other calculations
- 5.1 Mobility
6 Footnotes
7 References

[edit] Sample preparation

In order to use the van der Pauw method, the sample thickness must be much less than the width and length of the sample. In order to reduce errors in the calculations, it is preferable that the sample is symmetrical. There must also be no isolated holes within the sample.

Some possible contact placements

The measurements require that four ohmic contacts be placed on the sample. Certain conditions for their placement need to be met:

They must be on the boundary of the sample (or as close to it as possible).
They must be infinitely small. Practically, they must be as small as possible; any errors given by their non-zero size will be of the order $D / L$ , where D is the average diameter of the contact and L is the distance between the contacts.

In addition to this, any leads from the contacts should be constructed from the same batch of wire to minimise thermoelectric effects. For the same reason, all four contacts should be of the same material.

[edit] Measurement definitions

The contacts are numbered from 1 to 4 in a counter-clockwise order, beginning at the top-left contact.
The current I_AB is a positive DC current injected into contact A and taken out of contact B, and is measured in amperes (A).
The voltage V_CD is a DC voltage measured between contacts C and D with no externally applied magnetic field, measured in volts (V).
The sheet resistance R_S is measured in ohms (Ω).

[edit] Resistivity measurements

[edit] Basic measurements

To make a measurement, a current is caused to flow along one edge of the sample (for instance, I₁₂) and the voltage across the opposite edge (in this case, V₃₄) is measured. From these two values, a resistance (for this example, $R 12,34$ ) can be found using Ohm's law:

$R_{12,34} = \frac{V_{34}}{I_{12}}$

In his paper, van der Pauw discovered that the sheet resistance of samples with arbitrary shape can be determined from two of these resistances - one measured along a vertical edge, such as $R 12,34$ , and a corresponding one measured along a horizontal edge, such as $R 23,41$ . The actual sheet resistance is related to these resistances by the van der Pauw formula

$e^{-\pi R_{12,34}/R_s}+e^{-\pi R_{23,41}/R_s}=1$

[edit] Reciprocal measurements

The reciprocity theorem [1] tells us that

R A B, C D = R C D, A B

Therefore, it is possible to obtain a more precise value for the resistances $R 12,34$ and $R 23,41$ by making two additional measurements of their reciprocal values $R 34,12$ and $R 41,23$ and averaging the results.

We define

$R_{\text{vertical}} = \frac{R_{12,34} + R_{34,12}}{2}$

and

$R_{\text{horizontal}} = \frac{R_{23,41} + R_{41,23}}{2}$

Then, the van der Pauw formula becomes

$e^{-\pi R_{\text{vertical}}/R_S}+e^{-\pi R_{\text{horizontal}}/R_S}=1$

[edit] Reversed polarity measurements

A further improvement in the accuracy of the resistance values can be obtained by repeating the resistance measurements after switching polarities of both the current source and the voltage meter. Since this is still measuring the same portion of the sample, just in the opposite direction, the values of R_vertical and R_horizontal can still be calculated as the averages of the standard and reversed polarity measurements. The benefit of doing this is that any offset voltages, such as thermoelectric potentials due to the Seebeck effect, will be cancelled out.

Combining these methods with the reciprocal measurements from above leads to the formulas for the resistances being

$R_{\text{vertical}} = \frac{R_{12,34} + R_{34,12} + R_{21,43} + R_{43,21}}{4}$

and

$R_{\text{horizontal}} = \frac{R_{23,41} + R_{41,23} + R_{32,14} + R_{14,32}}{4}$

The van der Pauw formula takes the same form as in the previous section.

[edit] Measurement accuracy

Both of the above procedures check the repeatibility of the measurements. If any of the reversed polarity measurements don't agree to a sufficient degree of accuracy (usually within 3%) with the corresponding standard polarity measurement, then there is probably a source of error somewhere in the setup, which should be investigated before continuing. The same principal applies to the reciprocal measurements—they should agree to a sufficient degree before they are used in any calculations.

[edit] Calculating sheet resistance

In general, the van der Pauw formula cannot be rearranged to give the sheet resistance R_S in terms of known functions. The most notable exception to this is when R_vertical = R = R_horizontal; in this scenario the sheet resistance is given by

$R_s = \frac{\pi R}{\ln 2}$

In most other scenarios, an iterative method is used to solve the van der Pauw formula numerically for R_S. Unfortunately, the formula doesn't fulfill the preconditions for the Banach fixed point theorem, thus methods based on it don't work. Instead, nested intervals converge slowly but steadily.

[edit] Hall measurements

[edit] Background

Main article: Hall effect

When a charged particle—such as an electron—is placed in a magnetic field, it experiences a Lorentz force proportional to the strength of the field and the velocity at which it is travelling through it. This force is strongest when the direction of motion is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field; in this case the force

$F_L = QvB\,\!$

where $Q$ is the charge on the particle in coulombs, $v$ the velocity it is travelling at (centimeters per second), and $B$ the strength of the magnetic field (Wb/cm²). Note that centimeters are often used to measure length in the semiconductor industry, which is why they are used here instead of the SI units of meters.

The Hall effect as it is used for the van der Pauw method.
(a) - a current flowing through a piece of semiconductor material
(b) - the electrons flowing due to the current
(c) - the electrons accumulating at one edge due to the magnetic field
(d) - the resulting electric field and Hall voltage

V H

When a current is applied to a piece of semiconducting material, this results in a steady flow of electrons through the material (as shown in parts (a) and (b) of the accompanting figure). The velocity the electrons are travelling at is (see electric current):

$v = \frac{I}{nAq}$

where $n$ is the number of electrons, $A$ is the cross-sectional area of the material and $q$ the elementary charge (1.602 x 10^-19 coulombs).

If an external magnetic field is then applied perpendicular to the direction of current flow, then the resulting Lorentz force will cause the electrons to accumulate at one edge of the sample (see part (c) of the figure). Combining the above two equations, and noting that $q$ is the charge on an electron, results in a formula for the Lorentz force experienced by the electrons:

$F_L = \frac{IB}{nA}$

This accumulation will create an electric field across the material due to the uneven distribution of charge, as shown in part (d) of the figure. This in turn leads to a potential difference across the material, known as the Hall voltage $V H$ . The current, however, continues to only flow along the material, which indicates that the force on the electrons due to the electric field balances the Lorentz force. Since the force on an electron from an electric field $ε$ is $q ε$ , we can say that the strength of the electric field is therefore

$\epsilon = \frac{IB}{qnA}$

Finally, the magnitude of the Hall voltage is simply the strength of the electric field multiplied by the width of the material; that is,

$\begin{align} V_H &= w\epsilon \\ &= \frac{wIB}{qnA} \\ &= \frac{IB}{qnd} \end{align}$

where $d$ is the depth of the material. Since the sheet density $n s$ is defined as the density of electrons multiplied by the depth of the material, we can define the Hall voltage in terms of the sheet density:

$V_H = \frac{IB}{qn_s}$

[edit] Making the measurements

Two sets of measurements need to be made: one with a magnetic field in the positive z-direction as shown above, and one with it in the negative z-direction. From here on in, the voltages recorded with a positive field will have a subscript P (for example, V_{13, P}) and those recorded with a negative field will have a subscript N (such as V_{13, N}). For all of the measurements, the magnitude of the injected current should be kept the same; the magnitude of the magnetic field needs to be the same in both directions also.

First of all with a positive magnetic field, the current I₂₄ is applied to the sample and the voltage V_{13, P} is recorded; note that the voltages can be positive or negative. This is then repeated for I₁₃ and V_{42, P}.

As before, we can take advantage of the reciprocity theorem to provide a check on the accuracy of these measurements. If we reverse the direction of the currents (i.e. apply the current I₄₂ and measure V_{31, P}, and repeat for I₃₁ and V_{24, P}), then V_{13, P} should be the same as V_{31, P} to within a suitably small degree of error. Similarly, V_{42, P} and V_{24, P} should agree.

Having completed the measurements, a negative magnetic field is applied in place of the positive one, and the above procedure is repeated to obtain the voltage measurements V_{13, N}, V_{42, N}, V_{31, N} and V_{24, N}.

[edit] Calculations

First of all, the difference of the voltages for positive and negative magnetic fields needs to be worked out:

V₁₃ = V_{13, P} − V_{13, N}
V₂₄ = V_{24, P} − V_{24, N}
V₃₁ = V_{31, P} − V_{31, N}
V₄₂ = V_{42, P} − V_{42, N}

The overall Hall voltage is then

$V_H = \frac{V_{13} + V_{24} + V_{31} + V_{42}}{8}$ .

The polarity of this Hall voltage indicates the type of material the sample is made of; if it is positive, the material is P-type, and if it is negative, the material is N-type.

The formula given in the background can then be rearranged to show that the sheet density

$n_s = \frac{IB}{q|V_H|}$

Note that the strength of the magnetic field B needs to be in units of Wb/cm². For instance, if the strength is given in the commonly used units of teslas, it can be converted by multiplying it by 10^-4.

[edit] Other calculations

[edit] Mobility

The resitivity of a semiconductor material can be shown to be^[2]

$\rho = \frac{1}{q(n\mu_n + p\mu_p)}$

where n and p are the concentration of electrons and holes in the material respectively, and μ_n and μ_p are the mobility of the electrons and holes respectively.

Generally, the material is sufficiently doped so that there is many orders-of-magnitude difference between the two concentrations, and so this equation can be simplified to

$\rho = \frac{1}{qn_m\mu_m}$

where n_m and μ_m are the doping level and mobility of the majority carrier respectively.

If we then note that the sheet resistance R_S is the resistivity divided by the thickness of the sample, and that the sheet density n_S is the doping level multiplied by the thickness, we can divide the equation through by the thickness to get

$R_s = \frac{1}{qn_s\mu_m}$