Talk:Van Conner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

2 top 10 records, sold over 1 million records, signed to major label for over 10 years, toured the world with huge bands.

Hmmmm?

[edit] Notability Dispute

Not notable? Are you kidding me? Van Conner was one of the founding members of the SCREAMING TREES. Here I go, getting a footer template set up and everything, straightening out the Screaming Trees content, and I see the "may not be notable" notice. The Screaming Trees weren't the most popular band out there, but they did manage to get a few videos on MTV back in the day. The problem with the article isn't "notability" but the fact that it (like a lot of the other Screaming Trees articles) are completely devoid of content. (Something I'll be working on throughout the week) Don't delete, but lots of clean up and additions (like the other ST pages) is needed. --Captain Cornflake 03:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Crazy, crazy stuff...Van Conner not notable? He was in a popular band that sold many records and had a hit single with Nearly Lost You, featured in the hit soundtrack of the movie Singles, which peaked at number 6 in the billboard chart... I reapeat: this is totally crazy...if Van Conner is not notable, then half of the musicians listed aren't either...and i don't even like Screaming Trees!!! Sure, the article is poorly written and basically is just a list, but let's be serious, remove that notability stuff, i don't think it's even in question Sickboy3883 13:45, 3 November 2006 (UTC)