Talk:Uterine fibroids

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page on Uterine Fibroids contains inaccuracies and myth. Rapid growth hasn't been considered an indication that a uterine tumor is cancerous for quite some time...medical content posted here is outdated and unreliable. 65.117.209.239 17:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

This page is total crap. People who come here for medical advice are insane.--Hollerbackgril 02:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Please remain civil, and remember, "I don't like it" isn't really much of an excuse. bibliomaniac15 01:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

How's this for "an excuse"... "Uterine Fibroids may be removed by NSAIDs, a hysterectomy, hormonal therapy, a myomectomy, or uterine artery embolization." Um, NO. How do NSAIDs, hormonal therapy, or uterine artery embolization REMOVE uterine fibroids? They don't. If the first paragraph in this article is this poorly writted/edited, what does that say about the rest of the information presented herein? Ugh. People who use wikipedia entries for medical advice/information are truly misguided on the background/accuracy of the information presented. No doubt Wiki has a medical disclaimer somewhere on its site addressing the potential liabilities of this...This site is simply unreliable in it's content and clearly unaccountable for any of it. Reliable resources do exist online. This isn't one of them.

If there is a problem with the content of this page, I'm putting up a tag. Disinclination 23:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)