User talk:Use the force
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 22:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User talk:Bobby1234567890
Hi, I see you added the {{vandalblock}} tag to User talk:Bobby1234567890. This is inappropriate. The user concerned has not been indefinitely blocked and adding a tag that suggests he has is misleading. Please do not do so again. Thanks, Gwernol 00:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Again, please stop using the {{vandalblock}} tag to peoples' talk pages. You are not a sysop, so it's not your place to state if someone's blocked or not. --ApolloBoy 00:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:My very fluffy cat.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:My very fluffy cat.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Andromedasculpt.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Andromedasculpt.jpg. However, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. cohesion 04:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] about my picture...
thanks for pointing out that the pic was not lisenced. how do i change the copyright info of a pic that has already been uploaded? Use the force 03:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, I'm glad you responded! All you need to do it pick the way you would like to license the image from the tags available on Wikipedia:Image copyright tags in the section called "for image creators", then on the image page, click "edit", then replace the tag that says {{no license|month=January|day=1|year=2007}} with the one you would like, including the double brackets. Be sure to tag the other images you uploaded also. If you have any questions let me know! - cohesion 03:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] deletion
I have noticed that you have been putting the template prod on many new pages. these pages should be tagged with one of many tags listed on the page Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion. most nonsense pages or what have you can be mrked thus. thanks. --Tainter 20:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiproject
Wikiprojects are pretty informal. You can edit yourself on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Psychedelics,_Dissociatives_and_Deliriants#Participants and add the userbox if you're into them. Mostly, it's just about providing accurate drug info to wikip. Thanks for helping! Miserlou 17:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Thanks! Use the force 21:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chemistry info on new pages
Hey mate good work with making new pages for the obscure chems out of PIHKAL, I've been going through and adding extra stuff like CAS numbers for all the compounds. Just a few mistakes though; GANESHA is not synthesised from 2C-G, and 2C-T-13 is not synthesised from 2C-T-2....neither of those synthetic routes would be practical. Also Shulgin didn't make 2C-F from 2,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde, although he probably could have done he chose a different route instead. If you read the chemistry sections of the PIHKAL page he says what they are actually made from, but I don't think these details are really needed for the wikipedia page so long as there is a link to the page from PIHKAL that has the full synthesis route written out. Otherwise good stuff, I hope to see many more pages on obscure psychadelics from you yet...there's still most of PIHKAL and TIHKAL to go! Meodipt 05:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Got it... fewer synthesis routes and more links to pihkal, thanks! Use the force 16:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Creating userboxes
Hey, if you want some advice on making userboxes check out Wikipedia:Userboxes#Constructing a userbox. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 07:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] MDMC disambig.
The MDMC in PiHKAL is very different from what is more recently called MDMC - a logical name defined from the 'Methylenedioxy-' and 'methcathinone' combined structure.
The MDMC in PiHKAL is named so because: "This compound got the sobriquet MACADAM from that horrible black gooey mess generated at the aldehyde stage. This was shortened to RCS and eventually the RCS was added to the MDMA parent name. Thus, MDMC. It doesn't really make sense; EDMA is more reasonable. But then there is no reason why MDMC should make sense."
Compare: aka methylone and PiHKAL's MDMC. The MDMC 'methylone' article linked in Template:PiHKAL is not the same MDMC ("What a strange and completely unsatisfactory compound!") in PiHKAL.
--x1987x(talk) 18:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out! Use the force 22:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 06:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Sweet, thanks! Use the force 17:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit count
Hi, thanks for your message. To get your edit count, use this link. Hope that helps. Feel free to get in touch if you have any further questions. All the best The Rambling Man 08:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] EDMA Chemical structure
There you go, Just posting it here so you find it quicker. --Mark PEA 14:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Psi-DOM
Hey mate good work with adding all those chems from PIHKAL, churning through them! Just noticed that you had made psi-DOM into a redirect page; I have amended this as I felt it could do with its own page. psi-DOM is a different compound from DOM which has slightly distinct albeit similar effects. I guess its not a particularly noteworthy compound but its interesting to note that the two methoxy groups from the DOx series can be put onto the 2,6 (or indeed the 3,5) positions instead of the 2,5 and still retain activity, so I thought a page for psi-DOM would be a good place to note this.
[edit] Some PIHKAL chemical structures.
Hey, I've done a few structures for the PIHKAL template, i've posted them here so you can use them in the pages when they are created (most if not all are the page name so don't need worrying about any special linkage).
--Mark PEA 18:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Analog wikilinks
You may want to use wikilinks to [[analog (chemistry)]] rather than [[analog]] in your edits regarding chemical substances. This will allow readers to avoid navigating through the analog disambiguation page. B Pete 02:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Good point! Use the force (Talk * Contribs) 02:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reverting userpage vandalism
A big "Thanks" for keeping an eye on my userpage and fixing a vandal's work followed by their odd contrition of dubious sincerity (perhaps to mask stuff the vandal had not yet reverted...). I appreciate your efforts. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 02:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
