Talk:Urgal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Previously, the article read: Urgals are not true monsters, although most consider them to be so. I changed this to: By most humans, Urgals are considered monsters. Whether or not they are "true monsters" is subjective and a non-encyclopedic claim. SpectrumDT 16:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Language section

Smith, you've added some stuff on their language. Fine, but I think we should make it slightly more organised. For example, a section on the Urgal language. The "Vocabularly" section I'm not so sure on: I think I might have reverted it in the past. I don't think it particularly helps the article by itself. Perhaps if we describe the language, then said "an example of this is [phrase currently listed]" we could get an accessible way of using the vocab there. Providing there's enough information available, we should definitely expand this section, but I'm not sure if the current layout is the best.

[edit] langage section, contiunued

i like your sideas because i took the section direclty from the inheritan wiipedia page and was only using it as a base to work away frim i didnt want to leave it eexaclty like that but i wanted there to be a lnaugage section. i agree with you and iw ant to take your suggestions. Smith Jones 22:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)