Talk:Ur-

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

I've removed:

In English, the word Urtext is used for something which would be called Urfassung ("first draft") in German.

because I'm virtually certain this is not so. Urtext means, "accurate rendition of the composer's considered intention", not "composer's first draft". See Urtext, as well as [1]. Opus33 23:25, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I'm sorry, this was my mistake. But I'll add the word Urtext (because it does contain the prefix Ur-) to the See also section. I hope you don't mind. <KF> 00:07, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Not at all! Thanks for thinking of this. Opus33 00:54, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)

"Recently, however, the prefix ur- has been used productively, especially by young speakers, to create countless neologisms. New words include the colloquialisms urfad ("very boring") and urgeil and urcool (both meaning "super", "very nice")."

This is also common in swedish. My german dictionary from 1942 has "ureigen" (rough translation "ur-(his(own", "particular, characteristic") "ureigenheit" (ur-own-ness) and ("ureigentümlichkeit") ("ur-own-dom-ly-ness") (both "particular, characteristic trait"), so I guess it could be disputed how "recent" this usage actually is... "eigentümlich" is a german word meaning strange, btw...

Also, a footnote, I found the german word "ururalt"... Funny...


I'm removing "ur .. meaning you not me" from the bottom of the page- even if it has a place in the article, which I'm certain it doesn't, it doesn't belong in the "See Also" section

[edit] Are references really needed here?

The tag

This article does not adequately cite its references or sources.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. (help, get involved!)
This article has been tagged since December 2006.

has just been added to the article. Of course a reference won't harm, but is it really needed?--Niels Ø 09:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../u/r/-/Talk%7EUr-_516e.html"