User talk:Unweasel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Weasel-inline
Template:Weasel-inline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Irishpunktom\talk 14:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- One is inserted once and does not affect the text of the article in any way, but highlights a problem and suggests that users go to talk to discuss it, your one gets shoved in where ever a user decides the articles language is using Weasel words, and so is inherently disruptive to the text. --Irishpunktom\talk 14:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- The Citation [citation needed] relates to a specific statement in the body of a text which my not be factual, as there is no citation to support the claim. It is put up with a view to removing the text if no Citation is presented within a given time. It is part of the process of verifying the contents of Wikipedia. Weasel Words has no such merit. --Irishpunktom\talk 14:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- If you believe that there are weasel words being used, you can out the {{weasel}} tag up, and discuss your reasons for this on the talk page, and change the words used if needed. This will not disrupt the body of the text at all. --Irishpunktom\talk 14:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Adding the tags may start a revert war. The best solution is always the talk page, and the {{weasel}} tag sends people in that direction. --Irishpunktom\talk 15:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- If you believe that there are weasel words being used, you can out the {{weasel}} tag up, and discuss your reasons for this on the talk page, and change the words used if needed. This will not disrupt the body of the text at all. --Irishpunktom\talk 14:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- The Citation [citation needed] relates to a specific statement in the body of a text which my not be factual, as there is no citation to support the claim. It is put up with a view to removing the text if no Citation is presented within a given time. It is part of the process of verifying the contents of Wikipedia. Weasel Words has no such merit. --Irishpunktom\talk 14:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
