User talk:Udstyle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Yukmouth
It's fine for me whatever your job is, but as you probably saw there had been TWO MySpace addresses at the previous infobox and one of them was exactly the same like the one accessable from Yukmouth's website. So what? And I don't understand why it is so appropriate to insert smokealot for him. Smokealot.com is for Smoke-a-Lot, personal MySpace profile is for Yukmouth (the fact that he is the CEO is fairly the same case as Masaru Ibuka for Sony, and as you can see there's no Sony.com link under the founder's page). It is that so simple. Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 09:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- As I said there were two addresses where
- As I said there were two addresses where
-
- Equals
-
- Consider that MySpaces are useful for infoboxes and references in Wikipedia. Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 18:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Regime (Members)
You said check SmokeALotRecords.com, but it's outdated. If you listen to the "Regime Roll Call" intro on All Out War 3, Yukmouth calls out everyone that is Regime, he says both Ms. Story aswell as refers to DJ Finagz as the "Regime DJ". He also says two other groups/cliques I can't make out.
Depure Records/Clique from Fresno? & Philies Boys from East Oakland? So by saying that Ms Story & DJ Fingaz aren't officially Regime, are you saying Yukmouth is a liar? I mean, I'm willing to admit I was wrong, but going on Yuk's own word, I take it their in...
Speaking of SmokeALotRecords.com though... I have a hard enough time getting it to come up. It won't come up in Opera, Internet Explorer or FireFox. It only comes up in the AOL Software. But... that's not really your problem. Just felt good to get that out, really pisses me off.
--Mizery Made 20:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: The Regime (Members)
Aight, I can't argue with that. I kinda put together the whole UDStyle-Untouchable Designs thing after I put that up. I was just saying it was outdated since I didn't see people like Grant Rice & BG Bulletwound who have been said to be Regime by themeselves (& Yuk) and they Rap aswell. Like I said though, I'm willing to admit I was wrong, I was simply using Yuk's intro as my "Roster" since I figured, it's coming from the man himself.
As for the Site not working, it probably is something to do with my ISP as it's always saying "Can't Connect To Server" *Shakes Fist At ISP* Keep up the good work though, I love the new SmokeALot site, alot better looking then the old one (before the redesign)... now if only Tech N9ne would redesign his, I swear it's been the same aside from a couple news updates since 2002 :\
Peace, Mizery Made 15:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Haydenp smaller.jpg
(Subject Closed)
- Side note that the deleting admin frequently has made out of process deletions. I'm considering starting an RfC. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 11:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yukmouth pic allegation
I didn't replaced or overwrite it as you can easily see on the page history of the image (I'm the first and only uploader). And the reason is beacuse I visited the page yesterady and saw the link turned red, so I only put up a new image under the same name. Possibly your old image was deleted because of not having a fair use rational attached to it. That's all I know. No need to thank. Cheers. Lajbi Holla @ me 22:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Pacsnoopsuge.jpg
Please stop removing the tags from Image:Pacsnoopsuge.jpg indicating that the image has insufficient rationale and should be shrunk. These are legitimate warnings for this image; it currently only has a rationale for a single article but is used in multiple articles. Remember, you need to resolve the problem before you remove the tags. --Yamla 17:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Godzillalogo small.jpg
(solved)
[edit] Image:Regimeimage1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Regimeimage1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 17:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RE: COI
You said: "This is the second time you have cited me for loose circumstances. All of the individuals you have mentioned I DO NOT Work for but have WORKED WITH on a private contractor basis which is not a conflict of interest since affiliation was never direct boss to worker basis. As an admin you should cite only those issues that present a direct threat to wikipedia. Not loose issue's open to easy interpretation. Also you have cited numerous images that at the time of their uploading did not require any rationale. It is only in the past few months that such things have been required for Logos. I will provide one for each in the coming day So please do not delete them before I have a chance to do so, which you have been known to do in the past."
- You are absolutely correct on most of the images I tagged. I will go through and remove the tags on these images. Please provide a fair-use rationale if it is convenient for you but please accept my apology for those. As to the conflict of interest, I believe this still qualifies as a conflict of interest but you are right, it is much less clear. What is important is that you are aware of this policy and understand it. Please let me know if you have any questions. --Yamla 20:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
