User talk:UCLARodent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, UCLARodent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 18:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Nevadapalacepic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nevadapalacepic.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nevada Palace
FYI, I have proposed it for deletion b/c of concern that the article violates WP:CORP. Please let me know if you believe it meets the criteria and how. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 18:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on December 13, 2006 to James Kim
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At any rate please do not do more than three reverts in a 24h period. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] James Kim
I understand that this debate is growing rather heated, but the issue of whether the article deserves a timeline or not is really a minor one in the grand scheme of things. Comments like "Crossmr's definition of consensus is whatever he thinks is correct" ([2]) are uncivil and unproductive. Please try to keep a cool head, as we are all trying to do the same thing. Nothing on Wikipedia is worth losing one's cool over. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Hkpeoplestamps.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hkpeoplestamps.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mtrlogo1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mtrlogo1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Nevadapalacepic2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nevadapalacepic2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 14:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Hkg57rat.jpg
Hi, I like to use cityscapes as desktop backgrounds, and I was wondering if you have a version of Hkg57rat.jpg [3] with a bigger resolution (preferably in the 1024/1280 range).
Great photo, by the way. =) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Leaf of Silver (talk • contribs) 19:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] WTF
kind of problem do you have with Robert D. Kaplan? He's important enough to qualify having his own Wikipedia entry, he's been namedropped since the Clinton administration AT LEAST, he's been writing interesting books about global history and politics since 1985 -- he even has a coterie of individuals who've been influenced by his theories, called Kaplanists, some of whom have set up a political blog called The Coming Anarchy. Stop it with your downgrading of his importance. I already edited out his own opinions of Lee Kuan Yew, even though they were stated clearly throughout the book I referenced, and concentrated the focus back on those Egyptian businessmen he talked to. I fully intend on putting back the text that you have so callously edited out. If you insist on editing out that text, which has complete relevance to the subject at hand, I will be forced to call a spade a spade and warn you about the implications of vandalizing on Wikipedia. (Krushsister 19:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC))