Talk:Two wrongs make a right

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

How is this a logical fallacy???

I don't think this is a fallacy either. Logic and morals are two different domains...

Read the page logical fallacy. This is an example of an "informal fallacy", something that is considered fallacious more because its simply a common error than because of an inherent logical inconsistency. -Silence 11:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eye for an eye

Why is it rarely mentioned that "eye for an eye" is an extension of this fallacy?

Also, it's objectively true that two wrongs do not make a right. Wronging someone because they wronged you just means that both people are, overall, hurt. There is little or no beneficiary factor here to over-ride this.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.124.23.45 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/w/o/Talk%7ETwo_wrongs_make_a_right_560e.html"