Talk:Two-Nation Theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Muslim leaders and politicians, a WikiProject related to the List of Muslim leaders and politicians. It has been rated - on the quality scale.

Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. This article has been tagged since January 2007.

	This article is part of WikiProject Pakistan which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan and Pakistan-related topics. This article is related to History of Pakistan. For guidelines see WikiProject History of Pakistan and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
	This article is maintained by the Indian history workgroup.
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

S Seagal 18:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)== Terrible Article ==

This is a terrible article that needs work, alot of work, its exceptionally biased and full of outright lies and violates Wikipedia NPOV.

It speaks less about the theory more about the criticism of the theory.

S Seagal 06:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

I find this funny:"full of outright lies". Considering that the quotations from Pakistani leaders occupy a bulk of of the article, if your argument is applied to their quotes, then you are implying that they just lied! At least try to be careful with the choice of words to avoid sounding dubious.

As for the criticism, unless one has been living in a cave, modern developments on the theory suggests there has been a rethink of "ideological" aspects of the two nation theory by Pakistan govt. itself. Therefore the recent articles/editorials about the validity of the two nation theory itself has been questioned by several sources. Idleguy 09:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm talking about the critics of the two nation theory, I take it you dont believe in it?

Beside the point here is that this article is more of a stub than an article there should be sections for an against the two nation theory aswell as ofcourse talking about what the two nation thoery means.

I propose that we write about the theory, and then have three sections underneath, one for support for the two nation theory, the other critics like yourself, and lastly quotes regarding the two-nation theory. S Seagal 18:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Ive added a section in support of the TNT and criticism of the TNT this way we can get both sides of the coin, that aside i removed some POV comments like 'Hindus and sikhs were all killed' and added a source that shows that pakistan has one of the largest hindu populations in the world that chose to remain in pakistan as oppose to go to india.

http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_hindu.html

This article needs to be expanded considerably. Its totally sub-standard

Im having problems showing the criticism and support sections instead they appear in the references section for some reason, if someone knows why perhaps they can fix that?

thanks S Seagal 18:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Interesting. This part of Pakistan's history sounds quite a lot like Zionism and the partition of Palestine. 41.243.98.189 15:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)