User talk:Turlo Lomon/history2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Reversion

Hi and thank you for reverting my page to its state before the visit of our rather odd co-editor. (No need to reply, unless of course you particularly want to.) -- Hoary 07:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism patrol

Hey, thanks for helping out doing RC patrol, it's always needed. I noticed a note you left on a vandal's page and I wanted to make a couple suggestions. I suggest always adding subst to test templates (and other user talk templates like welcome messages). It helps if one of the templates gets vandalized, it's easier on the servers, and it makes it seem less templat-ey if they look in the edit window. Perhaps more controversially, I'd also suggest going up in sequence through the test templates, rather than skipping to test 4 after a test 2 (the edit I noticed [1]). While not everyone does this, it is encouraged. It makes it easier to block the vandal, since it's clear that they've received the full set of warnings. Also, theres a chance that the vandal will desist after a few warnings. It's also easier for the next person if you go in order (e.g. if someone leaves a t3 for the first message, do I leave a t4 for the second? Go back to t2?). Anyway, you can do with this advice what you want, I just thought I'd let you know my thoughts on it. Hopefully I haven't been too annoying by leaving you bossy messages as my introduction to you! Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions or want to discuss anything. Thanks again for doing RC patrol! Peace, delldot | talk 17:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for taking notice in my work. I appreciate the bluntness in your feedback. The example you posted was one where the vandal received a test2, then a second page was added (implying test3), when I added the test4. I will careful in the future to not skip actual levels. I didn't know about the tricks for subst on the templates, so I will start using that immediately. Thanks again for the feedback. Turlo Lomon 04:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Well thanks for responding positively to the feedback. I can see you work well with others and are an asset to the project! Peace, delldot | talk 05:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

RC Patrol

Hi. You reverted some vandalism to Tramp but sadly reverted to an already vandalised article. I've removed that as well. Not a crticism, just something to watch out for. Thanks for your hard work on recent change patrol Keep it up!Pedro1999a |  Talk  11:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

LOL. OMG. I read what you reverted. I didn't realize that other user was also having a "conversation" at the same time. Thanks for watching my back. Turlo Lomon 11:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Your're welcome. I note we just got involved on the vandalism of Fraud as well!! I have reported the user for a block. Pedro1999a |  Talk  12:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Tireless Reversion of Vandalism

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Your tireless work against vandalism has not gone unnoticed. Here's a barnstar:) Pedro1999a |  Talk  12:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! My very first award. And on this good note, I am going to get some sleep. Turlo Lomon 12:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Wild beasts vandilism from my account

Hi, you recently posted on my user page that I have vandilised the wild beasts, checked the page history and my account did vandalise the page - however it wasn't me hat did it!! At that precise time, i was tucked up in bed! Don't have a clue who's been using my account. Have you got any ideas of what I can do so people don't think I'm a vandal? I'm normally the one handing out the warnings to other people! Anyway, cheers for sorting it out RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 08:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Based on the reply on my talk page, I would recommend changing your password immediately. Turlo Lomon 10:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. It is very apprechiated. Continue to be bold! Kamope · talk · contributions 12:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Your message

I'm in the process of listing a bunch of IPs as sock puppets. Is this wrong? I'm following the directions and examples on the sock puppet page. Am I not supposed to be tagging each page? thanks Rossrs 09:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

You need to read the second part of my message. You made an error on one of the ones you did. It created a regular article instead of a user page. Turlo Lomon 09:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I see what you mean now. I didn't realize I missed the colon. Thanks for letting me know. cheers Rossrs 09:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Dear Thanks for protecting my page. i was checking History of my page it was you who Revert it to original shape .Once again Thanks Khalidkhoso 00:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Working man

The Working Man's Barnstar
You tirelessly fight vandals and other bad edits. Despite the weary repetition of continually using reverts and tagging user pages appropriately, you never seem to tire of the task. Thank you for your efforts to keep Wikipedia in good order. Vassyana 11:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)