User talk:Tu160m
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 |
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content | |
|
Newcomers: Welcome kit | Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard | Discussionboard Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions |
||
pamri 06:10, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] wikiproject aircraft
welcome aboard! if you've got any questions, comments, or proposals, by all means post them in the project talk page or ask myself, User:Ingoolemo, User:Lommer, User:Rlandmann, or any of the other active project members. see you around. -ericg ✈ 02:23, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] INCOTW
Military History of India is now the new INCOTW. Thanks for voting for it. User:Nichalp/sg 14:16, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] SU-27
Hi Tu160m. First off, congrats on a great aircraft page - always nice to see. Recently I got a message from ericg and the boys at wikiproject aircraft: it seems that they have dropped the blue fact box that you have on the Su-27 page. They have a template where you can put the info at the bottom, which you can see here template talk:aircontent. Maybe you already knew that, I don't know, but I thought I'd just pass it on to another aviation fundi. Again, nice work on the page!--Xiphon 18:22, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Kannada wikipedia
Hi there. Have you checked Kannada wikipedia? --H P Nadig * \Talk \Contributions 17:04, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Ijt1.jpg
 |
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Ijt1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Infobox
There is a consensus discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft#Infobox Aicraft consensus discussion on adopting a non-specifications summary infobox for aircraft articles. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks! - Emt147 Burninate! 18:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Arboria
[edit] Arboria
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Arboria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. gadfium 18:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
