Talk:Tropical Storm Fabian (1991)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

Tropical Storm Fabian (1991) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.

	Caribbean Portal This article is supported by the Caribbean WikiProject, which provides a central approach to Caribbean-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please help us by assessing and improving articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Assessment

Well this is one storm I didn't expect getting an article. Very nice, Start class for now. For B, add an external links section.Mitchazenia(8300+edits) 13:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

External links have been added. What's missing for a B? – Chacor 14:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Close enough. May need some cleaning up, but I doubt there's much more info on this. --Coredesat 14:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

• Well-written - Weak pass - Parts need to be re-written to flow better. For example, I think it should be mentioned that it became a tropical depression at a certain time before it is mentioned that it became a tropical storm. Also, (though this might be a discussion for elsewhere) should knots be the unit for wind speed? No other Atlantic articles do that. I don't think there should be as many, if any direct references to the NHC discussions. It's about the storm, not about how forecasters handled the storm (though that is important, too). Also, the lede should be expanded a bit.
• Factually accurate - Big pass
• Broad - Big pass
• Non-POV - Pass
• Stable - Pass
• Images - Pass

I'll pass it, but I think what I mentioned needs to be addressed. Good job to those who worked on it. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)