Talk:Tropical Storm Danielle (1992)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones. |
 |
Tropical Storm Danielle (1992) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. |
[edit] Info
Wow that's a lot for such a tiny storm! B-class. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 15:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was surprised how much info there was out there. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Well, I was surprised when I first saw it. I love the NHC archive. I wish they had the archive extended from 1996 to ~2000, though. It seems storms from 1991 to 1995 have more info than 1996 to 2000. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, what annoys me more is the 1968-90 period just has the TCRs but the early 60s has the same detailed info as the early 90s. Needs more pics though, the rainfall graphic perhaps?--Nilfanion (talk) 16:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yea, definetly regarding the early 60s/late 50s. Oh yea, I knew there was something I forgot to add. I'll add the rainfall pic. However, there's a damage pic in one of the newspapers. Do you think it would be ok to use that, seeing it's a newspaper cover? Here's a link. I never know with images, but I thought I'd ask. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like it's fine to use and add to the article. Good find. CapeVerdeWave (talk) 12:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yea, definetly regarding the early 60s/late 50s. Oh yea, I knew there was something I forgot to add. I'll add the rainfall pic. However, there's a damage pic in one of the newspapers. Do you think it would be ok to use that, seeing it's a newspaper cover? Here's a link. I never know with images, but I thought I'd ask. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, what annoys me more is the 1968-90 period just has the TCRs but the early 60s has the same detailed info as the early 90s. Needs more pics though, the rainfall graphic perhaps?--Nilfanion (talk) 16:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I was surprised when I first saw it. I love the NHC archive. I wish they had the archive extended from 1996 to ~2000, though. It seems storms from 1991 to 1995 have more info than 1996 to 2000. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] GA Passed
Congrats on bringing this article to GA status. Tarret 15:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
