Talk:Tropical Storm Bilis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Todo
I seriously need help cleaning this up, because I'm finding some inconsistencies in the damage reports (the very few of them I can read or otherwise make out). I can't find any indication of 15 billion yuan in damage. The impact section is basically everything Momoko contributed to the season article. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 02:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Never mind, I found some English sources. Looks like this was quite a damaging storm. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The maximum wind speeds are inconsistent: 60kt in the infobox and 55kt in the storm history. Otherwise, good job with little information. —Cuiviénen 03:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Whoops. Fixed. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Is this a B-class? íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 15:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Probably not. There's still some cleanup that needs to be done, and I'm in the process of converting the references to cite web format. Half the ReliefWeb links I used are now dead for whatever reason, so I'm also replacing them with alternative ones. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Impact Pictures
Well, I found some impact pictures, but they're not free. I might need help finding some pictures that are free for us to use. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 10:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Redesignation?
Does anyone think this will be officially declared a typhoon when they review it? (Since there is no real "typhoon season", that could be anytime) CrazyC83 18:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- most likely. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 18:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Quite possibly. PAGASA had this as a 70 kt typhoon, if I recall correctly, so the JMA might do the same. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
JMA often downgrades a typhoon to STS in post-analysis (such as Utor, Chanthu) but rarely (if not never) upgrades a storm.Momoko
[edit] Coverup accusations
Looks like the PRC government is accusing local governments of covering up damage and casualty statistics. Should this be included in the article? --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 00:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- sure. The more the merrier. :P íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 02:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good article has passed
An expansion would be good for FA, but nevertheless, the aricle meets the criteria. Iolakana•T 20:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)