Talk:Troll 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I fixed this up a bit and added a little more information. I left the neutrality tag up...someone else besides me can determine that much.
Seriously, that's it? One sentence? This is a ridiculously short article, and is quite cleary not a neutral point of view. user:Rebochan
- A stub. I added some. Ummm... why are the director and the top three actors red links? RJFJR 00:49, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Neutrality?
I tagged this page with a Neutrality dispute. Should we really consider the statement, "people who like trashy movies" neutral?
ClintFord 15:45, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Tagging Troll 2 with a neutrality dispute because someone suggested it was a "trashy movie" shows that Wikipedia is run by a bunch of complete nincompoops.
The above is a non sequitor, or something spelled very much like it. How can there be no page for the original 'Troll'? That film was great!
- Well, it seems that the NPOV dispute has been cleared up so I have removed the tag. - AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 11:42, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Trashy might be a bit harsh, but this movie is generally seen as one of the worst, if not the worst movie ever made. There are a lot of people (myself included) who actively seek out truly bad movies. Some movies are so bad they are good, this is so horrible it is wonderful. I loved the part where the father says "At this time of night, they are probably all asleep". What makes it funny is that you can see that it is obviously about noon. These must be the laziest farmers in the world.--RLent 18:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Vandal
Just took out the line "exploitation actress" and replaced it with "erotic actress". This is why I think wikipedia will never be a reliable source and is much a waste of time, and this is why I spend so much time finding these little things to fix. If you see it again, please revert it. JayKeaton 05:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removed Line
I just removed this line: "and is rated on the list not to have been featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000" because it did not make any sense. Feel free to make it more coherent and add it back in. --Thisisbossi 01:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)