Trimorphic Protennoia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of a series on
Gnosticism

History of Gnosticism

Gnosticism
Mandaeism
Manichaeism

Syrian-Egyptic Gnosticism
Sethians
Thomasines
Valentinians
Basilideans

Fathers of Christian Gnosticism
Simon Magus
Cerinthus
Valentinus

Early Gnosticism
Ophites
Cainites
Carpocratians
Borborites
Thomasines

Medieval Gnosticism
Paulicianism
Tondrakians
Bogomilism
Catharism

Gnosticism in modern times
Gnosticism in popular culture

Gnostic texts
Nag Hammadi library
Codex Tchacos
Gnosticism and the New Testament

Related Articles
Gnosis
Pythagoreanism
Neoplatonism and Gnosticism
Esoteric Christianity
Theosophy

This box: view  talk  edit

The 'Trimorphic Protennoia' is a Sethian Gnostic text from the New Testament apocrypha. The only surviving copy comes from the Nag Hammadi library.


I am the thought of the Father, Protennoia - I am Barbelo, the perfect glory and the immeasurable invisible one who is hidden. I am the reflection of the invisible spirit and it is through me that the All took shape and I am the Mother, and the light appointed as Virgin, she who is called Meirothea, the incomprehensible Womb, the unrestrainable and immeasurable voice' - Barbelo


Contents

[edit] Similarities with other texts

Like the more familiar Apocryphon of John, to which it is similar, it is thought to be from the mid-second century, and similar in style to the Gospel of John. In particular, there is great similarity with the prologue, although the prologue of the Gospel of John sets out to explicitly deny Gnosticism, using their own language against them.

[edit] Mysticism

The name of the text means The first thought in three forms, and appears to have been rewritten at some point to incorporate Sethian beliefs, when originally it was a treatise from another Gnostic sect. Unusually, the text is in the form of an explanation of the nature of cosmology, creation, and a docetic view of Jesus, in the first person. That is, the text is written as if it is God (the 3-fold first thought) writing it. Like most Gnostic writing the text is extremely mystical, more so for being in the first person. Whilst it appears quite difficult to understand, this was the intention, as Gnosticism was more concerned about the way the text affected people than the content of it.

[edit] Secret teachings

In common with mystery religions, there were secret teachings, and not all texts were intended to be read by uninitiated people. This text appears to have been written for a higher level of initiate, part of the way through — stating Now behold! I will reveal to you my mysteries, since you are my fellow brethren, and you shall know them all, although tantalizingly the next five lines are missing and followed by I told all of them about my mysteries. Some speculation has considered the possibility that these missing five lines were always missing, having never originally existed, their absence itself being a teaching of the text.

[edit] References

In other languages