Talk:Tree house

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] Should tree houses be considered a kind of "Fort"?

Should tree houses be considered a kind of "Fort"?

There should be a distinction, forts are for defensive purposes, and houses for living in.

Apparently not when it comes to tree houses and tree forts. Pascal.Tesson 00:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

There are about 20 companies making their living by building treehouses - not forts ! Maybee it`s up to them to work on these articles... Nico from TrueSchool treehouses

A treefort is a treehouse. These two articles need work and input from people in the business.

[edit] Coocalacalaca?

A quote from the article: "They can also be used for storing food out of reach of scavenging predators. As in the flying coocalacalaca". Even if there were coocalacalacas, treehouses wouldn't keep them out of reach of the flying ones, now would they? M414 08:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] merge tree fort in here

I don't mind making a distinction between tree houses and tree forts but the content is better organized if this is done within a single article. Pascal.Tesson 16:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

  • I agree, the subjects can be adequately distinguished in one page, merge them. Vicarious 03:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • The merge sounds like a great idea. Go for it. Edison 17:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Agree Flyguy649 20:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge--Tabun1015 04:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Agree
  • Merge --Calabashhh 14:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/r/e/Talk%7ETree_house_9539.html"