Transnational progressivism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Transnational progressivism is a term coined by Hudson Institute Fellow John Fonte in 2001 to describe a movement and political view that endorses a concept of postnational global citizenship and promotes the authority of international institutions over the sovereignty of individual nation-states.
Fonte argued that the core beliefs of this view include:
- Advocating the goals of an identity group rather than individual: "The key political unit is not the individual citizen...but the ascriptive group (racial, ethnic, or gender) into which one is born."[1]
- An oppressor/victim dichotomy: "Transnational ideologists have incorporated the essentially Hegelian Marxist "privileged vs. marginalized" dichotomy," with "immigrant groups designated as victims."[2]
- Proportional representation by group: "Transnational progressivism assumes that "victim" groups should be represented in all professions roughly proportionate to their percentage of the population. If not, there is a problem of "underrepresentation."[3]
- Change in institutional values: "the distinct worldviews of ethnic, gender, and linguistic minorities must be represented" within dominant social and political institutions.
- Change in the assimilation paradigm: "The traditional paradigm based on the assimilation of immigrants into an existing American civic culture is obsolete and must be changed to a framework that promotes "diversity," defined as group proportionalism."[4]
- Redefinition of democracy: "Changing the system of majority rule among equal citizens to one of power sharing among ethnic groups composed of both citizens and non-citizens."[5]
- Deconstruction of Western national narratives and national symbols in favor of post-modern multiculturalist views.
[edit] Examples of attempts to change modern historical national narratives
In the United Kingdom, October 2000, "a UK government report denounced the concept of "Britishness" and declared that British history needed to be "revised, rethought, or jettisoned."
In the United States, the "National History Standards," recommended altering the traditional historical narrative. Instead of emphasizing the story of European settlers, American civilization would be redefined as a multicultural "convergence" of three civilizations—Amerindian, West African, and European.
In Israel, a "post-Zionist" intelligentsia has proposed that Israel consider itself multicultural and deconstruct its identity as a Jewish state. Even Israeli foreign minister Shimon Peres sounded the post-Zionist trumpet in his 1993 book , in which he deemphasized "sovereignty" and called for regional "elected central bodies," a type of Middle Eastern EU.
[edit] See also
- Cosmopolitanism
- Democratic peace theory
- Federalism
- Federal World Government
- Global governance
- Internationalism (politics)
- Multilateralism
- National sovereignty
- Presidentialism
- Recursionism
- Supranationalism
- United Nations
- World political party
[edit] External links
- http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/archives_roll/2002_04-06/fonte_ideological/fonte_ideological.html Text of Fonte article]
- Analysis of Transnational progressivism
- Blogger Stephen Den Beste summary of Transnational Progressivism
- Gulliver's travails
- Liberal Democracy vs. Transnational Progressivism: The Future of the Ideological Civil War Within the West (pdf of article as it appeared in Orbis, Summer issue of 2002)