Talk:Trapped in the Closet (South Park)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Peer review Trapped in the Closet (South Park) has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trapped in the Closet (South Park) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Article policies
Trapped in the Closet (South Park) is part of WikiProject South Park, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia articles related to South Park. If you wish to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-Importance on the importance scale.
Good articles Trapped in the Closet (South Park) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology.
The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics.
See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments
To-do list for Trapped in the Closet (South Park): edit  · history  · watch  · refresh


Here are some tasks you can do:


[edit] High Importance?

I see that this article is tagged as a high importance Scientology article. Is one TV show that important? Thanks. Steve Dufour 03:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

  • This is a question for the talk page WP:SCN, not here. Thanks. Smee 03:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
Are there any medium or low importance articles in the Scientology series? :-) Steve Dufour 15:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, please refer to WP:SCN and the associated talk page for more info, not here. Thanks. Smee 16:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
Of course it is not high importance. It is of zero importance to understanding Scientology, the correct purpose of the Scn series. It is of low importance to understanding (as opposed to simply repeating) criticism of Scientology, another valid purpose. It is of high importance to presenting a biased view of Scientology, a disallowed use of Wikipedia. So, Steve, pick which one of those is your goal for the project and make the appropriate adjustment to the rating. Remember, the most important thing about Wikipedia is that it is a wiki - you change things that you believe are wrong, misrepresented, etc. --Justanother 16:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
This is a more appropriate discussion for the WP:SCN talk pages. Please move any further comments in this thread there. Thanks. Smee 16:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
Steve can move it there if he cares to. I can answer his question here if I care to. And it is totally appropriate that parties interested in the South Park series but not especially interested in Scientology know what is going on with this article so here is just fine, thank you, Mr. Smee. If an actual change is made then, yes, any needed discussion should take place there. --Justanother 16:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
That sounds more fair to me. I understand that this episode was a very important event in the history of the South Park series, of which I have never seen an episode since we don't have cable TV. On the Scientology issue, I have already said that there are way too many articles for this fairly small group of people with a not too remarkable belief system. On the other hand, their founder was quite an interesting guy. Wishing everyone well. Steve Dufour 17:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. Later... Smee 18:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC).

I checked out the project and there are 236 Scientology articles. 22 are top importance, 56 high importance, 91 medium importance, and 67 low importance. Steve Dufour 04:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Again, please take these comments specific to WP:SCN to that talk page. This is not relevant here. Thanks. Smee 04:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Questions

I saw that your trying to get this article to FA status, and it is a pretty good article. There is a LOT of stuff to cover and it seems to be well written. But, i have a couple questions:

  • I am a member of the South park WikiProject (Albeit an inactive one) but I am curious as to why it is of top importance. In the Simpsons Project, all episodes are of mid importance, except the first episode.
  • I know there is no policy against them, but I was wondering if the notes are really necessary. Could they be integrated into the main article?

Other than that, the article looks pretty good. I'll help out a little if I can. -- Scorpion 02:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/r/a/Talk%7ETrapped_in_the_Closet_%28South_Park%29_b942.html"