Talk:Translating "law" to other European languages
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on December 24, 2005. The result of the discussion was no consensus. An archived record of this discussion can be found here. |
[edit] For deletion?!
Come on Zoe, gimme a break. I'm just starting the article. What's the problem with it?! It is not a Wiktionay entry, as you will see. Velho 04:12, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
The article shouldn't be deleted since (1) it is not a dictionary entry, (2) it concerns an argument used by (English speaking) legal positivists and their opponents, and (3) it is as relevant an article on language comparison as any other (there is even a category named "language comparison"). Velho 05:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Could someone please explain why on Earth this article should be deleted before inserting the AfD tag?! Velho 15:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
This seems a valid, informative and interesting article about a real translation problem in Law. Why would anyone want to delete it? The Ogre 18:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- Wikipedia deletion policy says that the tag must remain until the deletion debate concludes (even if everyone thus far has been voting against deletion), so please don't remove it. The debate is not taking place here, but at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Translating "law" to other European languages, so please post your votes/comments there! I also left a message on User:Velho's talk page. Thank you. Blackcats 19:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Why is there both a "Translating "law" to other European languages" and a "The translation of "law" to other European languages" page? Merge and redirect? 81.232.72.53 00:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Move article?
What about moving the article to Ius and lex? Blackcats and Neutrality voted for it, and it now seems to me a good idea. If somebody else agrees or nobody says anything within a few days, I'll move and reorganize it, so that the focus will be on legal philosophy issues and the translation problem becomes only one of the sections. Velho 20:50, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
The issue is that the post, which I like, is really part of positive law discussions. How about: Positive Law: Linguistic Problems, or something like that?
