Talk:Transcaucasian SFSR
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Comments
Should this be translated as "Federated" instead of "Federative"? "Federated" is much more common, for instance by philatelic authorities, and the US State Dept also says "Federated" in its capsule history of Azerbaijan. Stan 15:54 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)
I've seen Federative, Federal, and Federated. I'll let you pick. I have no preference. Danny
[edit] Article moved
I've changed the name of this article from Transcaucasian Federative Soviet Socialist Republic to Transcaucasian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic, as in noted in Encarta [1] and Britannica [2]. --Cantus 18:10, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Map
Someone needs to fix the map - it should have proper 1922 borders. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.202.98.47 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- It doesn't look that bad to me. The main problem seems to be North/South Korea. I'm also not sure East Prussia is large enough, but that's rather peripheral (as is Korea, I suppose). On the other hand, it does have the Tuvinian People's Republic in its proper location. This includes details on the republics and their borders. -David Schaich Talk/Cont 03:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- I fixed it. Korea is united, East Prussia and Germany are bigger. Poland's borders are fixed. Lithuania is smaller. -- Clevelander 23:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- yeah it looks much better now, still there are problems though: Ukraine and Belarus should be a little smaller, their western parts are supposed to belong to Poland. See this map for reference: http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/WF4.USSR.21TO29.JPG
-
-
-
-
- Okay, how does it look now? -- Clevelander 01:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Looks great. :) The only inaccuracy that I can still see is the absence of People's Republic of Khorezm and People's Republic of Bokhara in Central Asia, but those are not vital I think. -- Kami888
-
-
-