Talk:Traktor DJ Studio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Many DJs, who were working with version 2.6, don't use version 3 any more because its unclearness."

This line seems unclear, and unprofessional. Can someone come up with a better way to state this, or just remove this line? Also, is this just rumor, or do we have facts to substantiate this statement?

[edit] Hangon

In response to the {{db-spam}} template, I believe this article is not a candidate for speedy deletion. I had similar concerns a few months ago and suggested a merge to Native Instruments, which was unsuccessful. Proponents of this article believe it is significant enough to merit its own page as seen in the responses at Talk:Native Instruments#Traktor merging into this article. Another bit of evidence that supports its notability are the links to it from various articles; I suspect these arose independently and not as internal link spamming.

That being said, this aricle has problems. My largest concern at this point is lack of references and no attempt to establish notability as suggested by WP:CORP or WP:SOFTWARE. My suggestion is a {{notability}} tag. Unfortunately I don't have the sources or interest to improve this article myself ✤ JonHarder ^talk 14:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't contest that this software is notable, but the whole thing reads like a piece of sales blurb to me. Asserting that is it 'very flexible' in the first line and that it's 'the most fully featured DJing software available'. I consider that this piece of software is notable enough to recieve a page, but this one is of too low quality to be of any use. JamJar 14:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, and I was a bit sloppy in my argument by wandering off in that direction. I hope someone can clean this up without having to do a complete rewrite. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 14:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

There is a bit too much here for this to be a speedy as a blatent advert; but there is no credible inoformation here that establishes this as in anyway a notable piece of software, so I've proposed this for deletion on that mark.--Isotope23 17:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Not even slow deletion...

i hope to simply remove the model was the right way. On the other case, please do not hesitate to write me a message.. I determined to remove the deletion proposal, as i was looking to this article to learn some infos and was very surprised. It seems to me traktor is used by many dj's, maybe not for their "official" mixes, but still do they use it.

I might be wrong, so please argue. I confess i am acting as urgency, as the article would have been deleted and everyone seems to agree there is a need for discussion. actually, i rather think the real problem is the low quality. I tryed to remove the worst "point of viewed" statements.

Maybe using some external sources would help to describe more interesting context... instead of list of "wonderful funtions"; )

pyl 23:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)