Talk:Traffic exchange
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
New exchanges come up every day - they shouldn't be added to the list. The two blog ones are from 2005 because that's when the first blog exchanges started. However exchanges also close up shop all the time so exchanges less than 2-3 years shouldn't be listed as "Notable exchange programs".
- BlogExplosion has existed for years. BlogMad is more notable than BlogAZoo. Computerjoe 11:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
I do not agree with the about above paragraph. What is a setting range, and/or guideline for success of a Traffic Exchange?
How does one define a success of a Traffic Exchange?
Also, the industries success rate for any business including offline businesses is about one year, then why set the success rate for Traffic Exchange at two or three years?
What mentioned above is like putting a limitation for success by the Traffic Exchange time being in the industry. I feel this is a discriminatory issue which needed to be addressed. We do not limit our children success because they are young or because they have less experience in life time. So lets hope we do not feel the same of any Traffic Exchanges and/or businesses.
October 2004 - So I was 3 months off 2005 ;-). As for BlogMad.. Add it once its not invite only if it is indeed better.
- Re added BlogMad - it's not invite only. Computerjoe's talk 07:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- You own BlogMad. Conflict of interest much? Panfakes 13:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia isn't a place to earn referalls.
I'm removing the referall links on the page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.23.250.2 (talk) 20:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC).