Talk:Tracee Ellis Ross
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group. | ||
[edit] Discussion
Didn't this person also spend a couple years on MAD TV? Correct me if I'm wrong.-WikiMommy
Hey... I don't understand the reason for your reverting my revisions ... I think that they were all appropriate, but many were not even at all controversial .... Let me know your thoughts ....
--Epeefleche 00:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
It is stated in the article that Tracee is the daughter of Diana Ross and Robert Ellis Silberstein. It's no secret that Diana Ross is a black woman and that Robert Silberstein is Jewish, thus making the blatant reminder that Tracee herself is a black and Jewish a bit redundant and insulting to peoples intelligence. "Tracee Ellis Ross (born Tracee Joy Silberstein on October 29, 1972, in Los Angeles, California) is an American Black half-Jewish actress." sounds a bit gaudy and convoluted. Simply pointing out that she is an American actress is fine. — DtownG 03:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Whether it is a secret that Robert Silberstein is Jewish misses the point. Not everyone whose father is Jewish is Jewish. With most people, in fact, that is not the case, as Judaism follows the mother not the father, other than if people convert or follow the Reform approach to the issue. Plus, if you check the bios of all the other Jewish actors and actresses, you will see that this is the common approach on Wikipedia. So I think that your above statement as to redundancy and insult to people's intelligence is misplaced. Consequently, I am reverting it.--Epeefleche 22:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Excuse me Epeefleche, but there was nothing wrong with my edits. Yet it was you who came and reveresed them. You seem to have control issues. - 152.163.100.201 04:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- I reverted his edits back to your version. He, however, continues to troll the article with his redundant and pointless revisions. DtownG 05:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Most of the material, confused by DtownG's constant reverts, has been put back in. The chart is especially very well done. Please let us know about anything else that has been lost in the confusion of the constant reverts, that is important, so that it can be put back in as well. Thanks. --Epeefleche 05:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
--To DtownG --
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
--To DtownG --
This is your last warning. The next time you remove content from a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing.
