Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 7, 2001
Decided January 8, 2002
Full case name: Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Ella Williams
Citations: 534 U.S. 184; 122 S. Ct. 681; 151 L. Ed. 2d 615; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 400; 70 U.S.L.W. 4050; 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 993; 67 Cal. Comp. Cas 60; 200 A.L.R. Fed. 667; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 149; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 197; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 39
Prior history: On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Holding
Court membership
Chief Justice: William Rehnquist
Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
Majority by: O'Connor
Joined by: unanimous
Laws applied
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted what the phrase "substantially impairs" in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 means.

[edit] References

  1. ^ 534 U.S. 184 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.
This article related to a U.S. Supreme Court case is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.