User talk:Tony1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Urgent FAR/FARCs edit |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions:
- Archive 1 (4 August 2005 to 14 October 2005):
- Archive 2 (15 October 2005 to 5 March 2006):
- Archive 3 (6 March to 15 June 2006):
- Archive 4 (16 June to 6 September 2006):
- Archive 5 (6 September to 29 December 2006):
- Archive 6 (30 December 2006 to 6 April 2007):
Contents |
[edit] WP:MEDMOS
Tony, you know how strongly I believe in the guidelines at MEDMOS for keeping medical articles up to par. We had basic consensus on the Guidelines, but largely because of my travel, we slacked off on the discussion there, and wham, Radiant marked the Proposal as Historical, to our shock! Now, he says we have to go to the Village Pump to revive it <groan>—not sure if that's true, since most of us argue we had consensus, just got lazy and didn't finish, largely my fault. Anyway, if we do have to go to Village Pump, I'm worried about a copyedit. I don't want to ask you do it now, because I just left a long list of final things to resolve at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (medicine-related articles) so the text may change in the next few days, but can you add it to your list of things to think about over the next week? (DK, you too, if you're reading :-) Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Unsure what is required in the short-term. Tony 03:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing; just a look at the actual guideline page in a few days from now, to see if it needs a copyedit before we maybe have to take it to Village Pump. Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Tony 07:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing; just a look at the actual guideline page in a few days from now, to see if it needs a copyedit before we maybe have to take it to Village Pump. Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Musicals
Me again; what a pest. I remember we talked once about musical theatre articles; they are a wreck. Have a look at Hello, Dolly! (musical), and then see Talk:The Sunshine Boys; there seems to be a systemic problem. (Of course, MEDMOS is first :-) Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Moon
A user reverted your copy-edit because s/he disagreed with one change.[1]. — Deckiller 05:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Britannica review?
Hi Tony,
Let me thank you again for your wonderfully scrupulous review of the Encyclopædia Britannica article. I followed your advice, and the article has been copy-edited by several experts, such as TimVickers, Phoebe, Ssilvers, SandyGeorgia, and Outriggr. Perhaps you could review the article once again, and see whether you can Support it? Thanks very much for your time and attention, Willow 22:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Devil May Cry
I have attended the lines you mentioned in the Featured Article Candidate page can you please take a look at them when you have time? feel free to leave comments on wich lines need work directly on my talk page that guarantees a faster action than the FAC page, thanks for your time. -凶 23:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New look at Representative peer
Changes at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Representative peer; pls revisit. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
