Tony Judt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tony Judt (born 1948, London, England) is a British historian, author and professor. He specializes in Europe and is the Director of the Erich Maria Remarque Institute at New York University. He is a frequent contributor to the New York Review of Books.
Contents |
[edit] Life
Born in 1948, Tony Judt was raised in the East End of London by a mother whose parents had immigrated from Russia and a Belgian father who descended from a line of Lithuanian rabbis. Judt was educated at Emanuel School, before receiving a BA (1969) and PhD (1972) in history from the University of Cambridge.
Like many other Jewish parents living in postwar Europe, his mother and father were secular, but they sent him to Hebrew school and steeped him in the Yiddish culture of his grandparents, which Judt says he still thinks of wistfully. Urged on by his parents, Judt enthusiastically waded into the world of Israeli politics at age 15. He helped promote the migration of British Jews to Israel. In 1966, having won an exhibition to King's College Cambridge, he took a gap year and went to work on kibbutz Machanaim. When Nasser expelled UN troops from Sinai in 1967, and Israel mobilized for war, like many European Jews, he volunteered to replace kibbutz members who had been called up. During and in the aftermath of the Six-Day War, he worked as a driver and translator for the Israel Defense Forces .
But during the aftermath of the war, Judt's belief in the Zionist enterprise began to unravel. "I went with this idealistic fantasy of creating a socialist, communitarian country through work," Judt has said (see this article in The Forward). The problem, he began to believe, was that this view was "remarkably unconscious of the people who had been kicked out of the country and were suffering in refugee camps to make this fantasy possible."[1]
Judt was also until late 2003 a contributing editor at The New Republic, a moderate magazine with strong pro-Israel leanings. However, his article in the 23 October 2003 issue of the New York Review of Books favoured a one-state solution in Palestine. Shortly after, he was dropped from the masthead of The New Republic and condemned by the magazine's literary editor, Leon Wieseltier, and other pro-Israel commentators.
[edit] Writings
[edit] European History
His latest book, Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945 examines the history of Europe from the end of World War II (1945) to 2005. Weighing in at nearly 900 pages, it has won considerable praise for its sweeping, encyclopedic scope [2] and was a runner up for the 2006 Pulitzer Prize for General Non-fiction.[3] Writing on such a broad subject was something of a departure for Judt, whose earlier works, such as Socialism in Provence and Past Imperfect, had focused on challenging conventional assumptions about the French Left.
[edit] Israel
Judt is also noted for his controversial writings criticizing Israel. These writings prompted furious responses, including from his former friend Leon Wieseltier, who argued in The New Republic that Judt had neither the background nor intellectual detachment to make his case.
In 2003, a controversial article for the New York Review of Books in which Judt argued that Israel was on its way to becoming a "belligerently intolerant, faith-driven ethno state" and called for the conversion of "Israel from a Jewish state to a binational one" with equal rights for all Jews and Arabs living in Israel and the Palestinian territories,[4] drew strong criticism from those who saw such a plan as tantamount to dismantling the Jewish State. [5] [6] The NYRB was inundated with over a thousand letters within a week of the article's publication and the article led to Judt's removal from the editorial board of The New Republic.[7]
Judt sparked further controversy by entering the melee surrounding the March 2006 John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt paper entitled "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" with an editorial in The New York Times. Judt argued that "[in] spite of [the paper's] provocative title, the essay draws on a wide variety of standard sources and is mostly uncontentious." He asked "[does] the Israel Lobby affect our foreign policy choices? Of course — that is one of its goals. [...] But does pressure to support Israel distort American decisions? That's a matter of judgment." He summed up his assessment of the controversial paper by asserting that "this essay, by two 'realist' political scientists with no interest whatsoever in the Palestinians, is a straw in the wind." He predicted that "it will not be self-evident to future generations of Americans why the imperial might and international reputation of the United States are so closely aligned with one small, controversial Mediterranean client state." [8]
In May of 2006 he continued in a similar vein with a feature-length article entitled "The Country That Wouldn't Grow Up" for the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. [9] The article, published on Israeli Independence Day, recaps Israel's short history, describing what Judt sees as a steady decline in Israel's credibility that began with the Six-Day War in 1967.
Because of his outspoken criticisms of Israel, Tony Judt was featured prominently in a critical essay entitled 'Progressive' Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism published by the American Jewish Committee.
In a March 2007 interview, Judt commented on the American need to block criticism of Israel as stemming from the rise of identity politics in the US. “I didn't think I knew until then just how deep and how uniquely American this obsession with blocking any criticism of Israel is. It is uniquely American.” [10]
[edit] Speech cancellation controversy
On October 4, 2006, Judt's scheduled New York talk before the organization Network 20/20 was abruptly cancelled after Polish Consul Krzysztof Kasprzyk suddenly withdrew his offer of a venue following telephone calls from the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee. The Consul later told a reporter that "I don't have to subscribe to the First Amendment." [11] According to The New York Sun, "the appearance at the Polish consulate was canceled after the Polish government decided that Mr. Judt's views critical of Israel were not consistent with Poland's friendly relations with the Jewish state." [12]
According to the Washington Post, the ADL and AJC had complained to Polish consul that Judt was "too critical of Israel and American Jewry," though both organizations deny asking that the talk be cancelled. ADL National Chairman Abraham Foxman called Judt's claims of interference "wild conspiracy theories." Kasprzyk told the Washington Post that "the phone calls were very elegant but may be interpreted as exercising a delicate pressure. That's obvious -- we are adults and our IQs are high enough to understand that."
Judt, who had planned to argue that the Israel lobby in the US often stifled honest debate, called the implications of the cancellation "serious and frightening." He added that "only in America -- not in Israel -- is this a problem," charging that vigorous criticism of Israeli policy, acceptable in Israel itself, is taboo in the US. Of the ADL and AJC, he said, "These are Jewish organizations that believe they should keep people who disagree with them on the Middle East away from anyone who might listen."[13]
The cancellation brought support from a roster of Judt's fellow academics and intellectuals who said there had been an attempt to intimidate and shut down free debate - seeming to prove the point that Judt had wanted to make. A 114-signature letter was written to Abraham Foxman, the prominent national director of the Anti-Defamation League, and published in The New York Review of Books.[14]
The ADL and AJC defended their decision to contact the Polish consulate, and rejected Judt's characterization of them. Foxman said that Judt has "taken the position that Israel shouldn't exist [and t]hat puts him on our radar," while David A. Harris, executive director of the AJC, said that he wanted to tell the consulate that the thrust of Judt's talk ran "contrary to the entire spirit of Polish foreign policy."[15]
In a later exchange on the subject in the New York Review Of Books, Foxman accused his critics of themselves stifling free speech when "they use inflammatory words like 'threaten,' 'pressure,' and 'intimidate' that bear no resemblance to what actually transpired." He wrote that the "ADL did not threaten or intimidate or pressure anyone. The Polish consul general made his decision concerning Tony Judt's appearance strictly on his own."
The New York Sun reported that "the appearance at the Polish consulate was canceled after the Polish government decided that Mr. Judt's views critical of Israel were not consistent with Poland's friendly relations with the Jewish state.(ibid)" However, Mr. Foxman's critics Mark Lilla and Richard Sennett argue that "Even without knowing the substance of those 'nice' calls from the ADL and AJC, any impartial observer will recognize them as not so subtle forms of pressure." [16]
[edit] Selected Bibliography
- Judt, Tony (2005). Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. Penguin Press. ISBN 1-59420-065-3.
- Judt, Tony (2004). Identity Politics In A Multilingual Age. Palgrave. ISBN 1-4039-6393-2.
- Judt, Tony (2000). Socialism in Provence 1871-1914 : A Study in the Origins of the Modern French Left. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-22172-2.
- Judt, Tony (1998). The Burden of Responsibility: Blum, Camus, Aron, and the French Twentieth Century. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-41418-3.
- Judt, Tony (1996). A Grand Illusion?: An Essay on Europe. Douglas & McIntyre. ISBN 0-8090-5093-5.
- Judt, Tony (1990). Marxism and the French Left: Studies on Labour and Politics in France 1830-1982. Clarendon. ISBN 0-19-821578-9.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- New York Review of Books - Collection of articles authored by Judt
- Historical Society, Boston University - Interview with Judt on Europe
- What History Teaches the Jews by Peter Coleman, review of Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945, Quadrant Magazine, July 2006, Volume L, Number 7-8
[edit] References
- ^ Embattled Academic Tony Judt Defends Call for Binational State. The Forward. Retrieved on April 17, 2006.
- ^ Postwar by Tony Judt. Metacritic. Retrieved on April 14, 2006.
- ^ The Pulitzer Prize Winners 2006: General NonFiction. Retrieved on October 29, 2006.
- ^ Judt, Tony (2003-10-23). "Israel: The Alternative". New York Review of Books 60 (16). ISSN 0028-7504. Retrieved on 2006-04-17.
- ^ Judt Labels Israel "Anachronistic," Calls for Binational State. Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) (2003-10-17). Retrieved on October 22, 2006.
- ^ Wieseltier, Leon. "Israel, Palestine, and the Return of the Bi-National Fantasy: What Is Not to Be Done", The New Republic Online, 2003-10-18. Retrieved on October 22, 2006.
- ^ Embattled Academic Tony Judt Defends Call for Binational State. The Forward. Retrieved on April 8, 2007.
- ^ Judt, Tony. "A Lobby, Not a Conspiracy", The New York Times, 2006-04-19, p. A21. Retrieved on November 3, 2006.
- ^ Judt, Tony. "The Country That Wouldn't Grow Up", Haaretz, 2006-05-05. Retrieved on May 8, 2006.
- ^ Bowley, Graham. "Lunch with the FT: Tony Judt", The Financial Times, 2007-03-16. Retrieved on March 19, 2007.
- ^ "Off Limits? Talk by Israel Critic Canceled", The Jewish Week, 2006-10-06. Retrieved on November 10, 2006.
- ^ "http://www.nysun.com/article/40962?page_no=1", The New York Sun, 2006-10-05, p. 1. Retrieved on November 10, 2006.
- ^ In N.Y., Sparks Fly Over Israel Criticism. The Washington Post. Retrieved on October 9, 2006.
- ^ Lilla , Mark & Sennett, Richard. "The Case of Tony Judt: An Open Letter to the ADL", The Financial Times, 2006-11-16. Retrieved on March 19, 2007.
- ^ "http://www.nysun.com/article/40962?page_no=1", The New York Sun, 2006-10-05, p. 1. Retrieved on November 10, 2006.
- ^ "http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19676", New York Review of Books, 2006-11-30. Retrieved on November 10, 2006.