From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.
|
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. |
|
|
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Israel because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WikiProject Israel}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Israel}} template, removing {{WikiProject Israel}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
One should not use Wikipedia to promote their own pet theories. The attempt to identify Kh. el-Maqatir has never been accepted by scholars working in the field. It is a failed attempt for both geographical and archaeological reasons, though it is actively promoted by a small, minority - namely Dr. Bryant Woods and his followers. However, their motivations (along with that of IBEX) are entirely theological and have little to do with the academic study of the ancient Near East. To state that Maqatir "may be biblical Ai" grossly exagerates the highly speculative, and otherwise discredited, state of research centered on this Middle Eastern site. Yadin twelve 06:32, 18 April 2006 (UTC)