User talk:Tmayes1965

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Editing

Something about the browser or editor you are using is causing your contributions to contain a large amount of extra carriage returns and often messes up the formatting in the articles you edit. Please consider either 1. using a more up-to-date web browser or 2. not cutting or pasting your content from another text editor, whichever is likely the cause of this, because it means that someone has to go back over everything you have added and correct its formatting. Thanks. --Fastfission 20:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 06:37, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sign Comments

Remember to always sign all of your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful. DV8 2XL 11:05, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Relativistic rocket formulas

I've put a bunch of formulas at User:Wwoods/Relativistic rocket formulas. I collected or worked them out several years ago, so I don't have the derivations at hand, but for most of them it shouldn't be to hard to verify them. —wwoods 22:35, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Incorrect information

Some of the recent edits you've been adding, along with being poorly formatted, with no regard to spelling, and without any references or citations whatsoever (please see our citation policy), have information which is patently incorrect. For example, in your Mk-14 article you wrote that the Mk-14 and the Mk-15 were weaponized versions of the Ivy Mike device. This is incorrect. Mk-14 was a weaponized version of the Castle Union device, while Mk-15 was of the Redwing Cherokee device, both of which were solid-fuel in contrast to the Ivy Mike device. The weaponized Mike device was the limited-production TX-16, an entirely different design. (See http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html). I really have to say that I resent having to clean up after your messes and would really appreciate it if you took more time to both write your contributions -- correcting at least the obvious spelling and formatting errors -- and to provide references for your contributions, since many of them are suspect. As it is, it requires at least two editors to go over every contribution you add to decide whether it should be kept or not, or even if it is correct, and that is not a good use of time. --Fastfission 14:44, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

I have never claimed to be infallible , but I believe that what I I wrote is correct about the MK 14 and MK15 .The source of my information on this, is the Atomic weapon mueseum of the U. S. Airforce in New Mexico. According to the muesuem only the Liquid Dueterium fueled emergency capability versions of the MK 14 and MK 15 H-bomb designs based on Mike were in the stockpile from 1953-1956 . The solid fueled version of them was not introduced into the nuclear weapon stock pile until 1957-1958 . tmayes1965

You're wrong, and every printed source says you're wrong, including government sources, and this is easily checkable without worrying about your memory of some museum tour you went on. For someone who makes such a big fuss about how much you supposedly know, you seem to make a lot of simple mistakes. Please get acquainted with our Wikipedia:Verifiability policy, and while you are at it please make an effort to spell correctly, if you want to contribute to Wikipedia in the future. --Fastfission 12:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Packistani A-bomb

I've nominated Packistani A-bomb, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Packistani A-bomb satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Packistani A-bomb and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Packistani A-bomb during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --DV8 2XL 01:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tmayes1999

Hello. You seem to be Tmayes1999 (talk • contribs) editing under a different name. Any particular reason for the name change? --Christopher Thomas 04:12, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Template:AFDWarning

Thank you for experimenting with the page Template:AFDWarning on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. Sandstein 07:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] High energy weapon design

The "design" in the title, as well as the content of the article, made it quite clear that it had nothing in it that wasn't covered by nuclear weapon design. It also had dozens and dozens of simple errors in it, as well as internal contradictions. --Fastfission 11:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/m/a/User_talk%7ETmayes1965_0775.html"