User talk:Tizes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Great&LittleHansLollik.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Great&LittleHansLollik.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hans Lollik Island

The article looks very good. do you think you could add your sources to it? It'd then make a fine candidate for the Did You Know? Main Page feature.Circeus 16:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Thx for comment. I'll add to this article over the next few weeks... and, I am the principal source for the material cited. Also, I own the image uploaded, and freely give the right to wiki and anyone else to use it and publish it, etc.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Learned intermediary doctrine

A tag has been placed on Learned intermediary doctrine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This article appears to be an essay without sources, cannot be verified, may be copied from another source, and is not written in an encyclopedic tone. It may be promotional in nature on behalf of the author.

Please note -- this is distinctly not promotional in nature.. I have no business whatsoever that has any relationship to the Learned Intermediary Doctrine. As for citations, it is extensively and explicitly cited. The balance is my original work. I will rewrite it a bit to have a more encylopedic tone, but offer it to the community because I value the Wkipedia and use it frequently. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 17:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removed speedy deletion tag on Learned intermediary doctrine

Please see the article talk page, Talk:Learned intermediary doctrine, for discussion, and feel free to take a look at Wikipedia's Help pages for assistance in editing the article into a format more in keeping with Wikipedia's style, formatting, references, etc. (For example, we need to cite accessible, published, secondary sources like practice books, law journals, etc., rather than citing directly to case authorities.) I have also added "cleanup" tags asking other editors to help with the project. Thank you for your contribution, and I apologize that it was misunderstood by another editor who thought it might be copied without permission from another work. Happy editing, --MCB 21:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thx

MCB -- thx for the help! it may take me a bit of time to deliver wiki in style, but i'll try to whip this into shape. overall, wikipedia is terrific... a grand experiment Tizes 06:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)