User talk:Tiphareth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Closure of Siberian Wikipedia

Oppose. Siberian Wikipedia is a marvellous creative endeavour, its destruction is a disgusting act of cowardice and vandalism. Especially so, because it is politically motivated. The fascistic crowd cheering destruction of this Wiki would be just as happy at Nazi rallies, burning books. -- Tiphareth 00:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Katyn censorship

Simply put, there is no need for a seperate section on 'Katyn denial' - it is discussed throughout the article. You are welcome to add information to it, particularly the last section which already mentions various attempts of denial, but adding a new section just with that example is not improving the overall style of the article. Also, you may want to be careful with accusing others of 'censorship' and 'bad faith', per WP:NPA and WP:AGF.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  00:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


Dear Piotrus, thank you for your message.

>Also, you may want to be careful
>with accusing others of 'censorship'

As I said to you, I am not going to go into deletion
wars with you, so your threats lack a point.

>Simply put, there is no need for a seperate section on
>'Katyn denial' - it is discussed throughout the article.

It's "separate". And you did not remove the section,
you removed everything. Quote, unquote:

Russian dissident
writer Yu.I. Mukhin (an editor of a radical
newspaper Duel) wrote a book "Katyn Detective"
("Катынский детектив") purporting to show that all
documents of Katyn massacre are in fact forgeries.
This theory is refuted on the site КАТЫНЬ.

This is what you deleted. If that's not censorship,
I don't know what is.

Anyway, they do have the "Holocaust denial" section
in Holocaust. Your attempt to expunge the mention of
dissent in Katyn pages looks like someone would go and
remove all mention of Holocaust denial from Holocaust
pages. It makes your point a way less credible.

Best regards
Tiphareth 00:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Although you've been here 6 months, I see no one actually said "welcome" yet, so, belatedly:


Welcome!

Hello, Tiphareth, and welcome to Wikipedia! <...> You might also be interested in following the discussions that occur at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics. linas 15:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi, Tiphareth!

Hi, Tiphareth! Welcome to Wikipedia!

I just reviewed your article Hall's universal group. I made a few tiny changes related to English idiom. It's a good article. Thank you! DavidCBryant 12:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Tiphareth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! Alex Bakharev 05:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)