Talk:Tip of the tongue
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Tip of the tongue was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake.
Date of review: No date specified. Please edit template call function as follows: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}} |
The creation of this page was a group project of Dr. Kent Norman's Spring semester 2006 course, Thinking and Problem Solving, at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Contents |
[edit] Comments
This article is looking good. Shouldn't History really include the Brown and McNeill paper rather than having a whole section with their names? Then I think that you can expand a little on the two other sections. It would be nice to include the Three-Stage Neural Netowrk model, but I don't know if any of you read Russian. User: Klnorman
Brown and McNeill merged into the History of TOT section. Expanded Current TOT literature section. I do not think we have knowledge of Russian, LOL. User: Dcflyer
[edit] Final Comments 10 May 2006
Very well done. The article reads well and is very interesting. I think that you have done an extremely good with the details and the theories. Final points for the Group part = 49/50. --User:Klnorman
[edit] Good Article nomination has failed
The Good article nomination for Tip of the tongue has failed, for the following reason(s):
- It's a very interesting article, but it needs a lead section which summarises the article's contents in about three paragraphs. Worldtraveller 12:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback. I will follow your suggestion. -- Dcflyer 22:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Does this article really need a picture of a tongue?
I don't see how a photograph of a tongue bears on the article. I vote to have it removed. It's just a picture for the sake of it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ulrich kinbote (talk • contribs).
- You are correct. The photograph has absolutely no bearing upon the information of the article. It was added so as not to have just a text article. It can be removed. -- Dcflyer 22:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tongue removed.
I removed the image of the tongue as irrelevant to TOT experiences. See discussion.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ulrich kinbote (talk • contribs).
