Wikipedia:Times that 100 Wikipedians supported something

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shortcut:
WP:100

This is a list of times when at least 100 Wikipedians (ideally excluding sock puppets) actually explicitly voted in support of something.

This page was created in May 2005 in reaction to the first admin candidate to receive 100 supports. The only previous cases of this happening were in Arbitration Committee elections. Due to the increasing number of Wikipedians, 100 supporting votes is no longer as rare, and WP:200 (Times that 200 Wikipedians voted support for something) now exists, as does WP:300 and even WP:400.

Contents

[edit] Arbitration Committee Elections

July 2004 election
  1. Jwrosenzweig - 107
  2. Raul654 - 100
December 2004 election
  1. Theresa Knott - 265
  2. Raul654 - 216
  3. Ambi - 203
  4. Sannse - 187
  5. Neutrality - 171
  6. David Gerard - 166
  7. Grunt - 162
  8. Fennec - 161
  9. Mirv - 159
  10. Cecropia - 159
  11. James F. - 155
  12. Ed Poor - 144
  13. Hephaestos - 140
  14. Charles Matthews - 132
  15. 172 - 124
  16. The Cunctator - 124
  17. Dante Alighieri - 101
January 2006 election
  1. Mindspillage - 299
  2. Charles Matthews - 253
  3. Fred Bauder - 251
  4. Filiocht - 226
  5. Jayjg - 226
  6. SimonP - 187
  7. James F. - 181
  8. Dmcdevit - 177
  9. Ilyanep - 153 (not appointed)
  10. Merovingian - 153 (not appointed)
  11. Dbiv - 152 (not appointed)
  12. Morven - 143
  13. Kelly Martin - 133 (withdrew)
  14. Jpgordon - 128 (not appointed)
  15. Kim Bruning - 128 (not appointed)
  16. Improv - 125 (not appointed)
  17. Sam Korn - 124
  18. Nandesuka - 104 (not appointed)
  19. Mackensen - 103
  20. Redwolf24 - 100 (withdrew)
    • Also, 13 candidates got over 100 votes to oppose them, of whom six got over 150. One candidate had the dubious honor of having over 100 supports and over 100 opposes.
December 2006 election
  1. Can't sleep, clown will eat me - 303 (not appointed)
  2. UninvitedCompany - 254
  3. Flcelloguy - 252
  4. Blnguyen - 241
  5. Kirill Lokshin - 235
  6. Paul August - 220
  7. FloNight - 204
  8. Geogre - 182 (not appointed)
  9. Radiant! - 181 (not appointed)
  10. Jpgordon - 180
  11. Will Beback - 175 (not appointed)
  12. Daniel.Bryant - 141 (not appointed)
  13. Alex Bakharev - 133 (not appointed)
  14. Samuel Blanning - 132 (not appointed)
    • Also, 4 candidates got over 100 votes to oppose them.

[edit] Requests for adminship

  1. Phaedriel (2nd) - 271 in support
  2. Danny - 256 in support, 118 in opposition ongoing
  3. Can't sleep, clown will eat me (3rd) - 246 in support
  4. Daniel.Bryant (2nd) - 233 in support
  5. Newyorkbrad - 225 in support
  6. Crzrussian (2nd) - 194 in support
  7. ProtectionBot - 185 in support (a bot, withdrawn after less than 4 days)
  8. BD2412 - 183 in unanimous support
  9. Werdna (4th) - 181 in support (vote failed, consensus not reached)
  10. Persian Poet Gal - 179 in unanimous support
  11. AmiDaniel - 169 in support
  12. Blnguyen - 160 in support
  13. Sarah Ewart - 160 in support
  14. Rama's Arrow (2nd) - 159 in unanimous support
  15. Sean Black (2nd) - 159 in support
  16. Lord Voldemort (3rd) - 156 in support
  17. Xoloz - 144 in support
  18. AzaToth (4th) - 143 in support
  19. Rob Church (4th) - 142 in support (vote failed, consensus not reached)
  20. Bookofjude - 141 in support
  21. Alphachimp - 138 in support
  22. Khoikhoi (2nd) - 136 in support
  23. Riana dzasta - 135 in support
  24. Misza13 - 132 in support
  25. TawkerbotTorA - 132 in support (a bot, consensus not reached)
  26. WJBscribe - 131 in support
  27. JoshuaZ - 130 in support
  28. William M. Connolley (2nd) - 129 in support
  29. Tawker (2nd) - 129 in support
  30. Rune.welsh - 128 in unanimous support
  31. Encephalon - 125 in support
  32. Ryulong (3rd) - 125 in support
  33. Lightdarkness - 124 in support
  34. Tariqabjotu (2nd) (Joturner) - 124 in support
  35. Joturner (2nd) - 123 in support (withdrawn)
  36. Pilotguy - 120 in support
  37. Thatcher131 - 120 in support
  38. Can't sleep, clown will eat me - 117 in support (vote failed, consensus not reached)
  39. Nilfanion - 117 in support (no oppose, one neutral)
  40. Samir (The Scope) - 114 in support
  41. Humus sapiens - 114 in support
  42. Proto (2nd) - 113 in support
  43. Carnildo (3rd) - 112 in support
  44. Func - 112 in unanimous support
  45. Srikeit (2nd) - 112 in support
  46. Yannismarou - 112 in support
  47. W.marsh (2nd) - 111 in unanimous support
  48. Kylu - 111 in support
  49. CBDunkerson - 111 in support
  50. Ta bu shi da yu (3rd) - 111 in support
  51. Arjun01 - 111 in support
  52. Ambuj.Saxena - 110 in support (vote failed, consensus not reached)
  53. Interiot - 110 in unanimous support
  54. Aaron Brenneman (2nd) - 110 in support
  55. Tangotango - 109 in unanimous support
  56. Bishonen - 109 in support
  57. Lar - 109 in support
  58. Anthony.bradbury (2nd) 108 in support
  59. Gator1 (2nd) - 108 in support (no oppose, one neutral)
  60. Cyde - 106 in support
  61. Bucketsofg - 105 in support
  62. Redvers - 105 in support
  63. Grandmasterka - 105 in support
  64. Nae'blis - 104 in unanimous support
  65. Yanksox - 104 in support
  66. Where (2nd) - 103 in unanimous support
  67. JzG - 102 in support
  68. Canadian-Bacon - 101 in support
  69. Jaranda (7th) - 101 in support
  70. MarkGallagher (2nd) - 100 in unanimous support
  71. MER-C (2nd) - 100 in support (consensus not reached)

[edit] Requests for bureaucratship

  1. Essjay - 143 in support
  2. Linuxbeak (2nd) - 120 in support

[edit] Regarding policy

Criteria for Speedy Deletion Proposal
  1. Unremarkable people - 120 to implement
  2. Attack pages - 110 to implement
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/United States Congress
Requests for rollback privileges poll
  • Double listing - 216 are supporting and 108 are opposing
Semi-protection policy straw poll
  • 103 voted in favor of the policy.
Three revert rule enforcement
  • 159 voted to implement the enforcement.
Userbox debate
  1. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Kelly Martin/Original - 127 to endorse the view that Kelly Martin abused her sysop powers
  2. Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions - 185 to keep
  3. Wikipedia:Userbox policy poll - A double listing, 163 in favor and 102 against
  4. Wikipedia:May Userbox policy poll - 105 in favor of moving userboxes to a userbox namespace, as proposed by User:TheTrueSora
Wikipedia:Delete unused username after 90 days
  • 252 voted in favor of the proposed policy, and it was rejected!
Wikipedia:Ignore all rules
  • 104 voting in support of the policy in straw poll.
Wikipedia:Blocking policy proposal straw poll
  • Of the two options in favour of the policy, 97 voted for option A and 126 for option B, a total vote in favour of 223 (to 11 against).

[edit] Deletion

Philip Sandifer Articles for Deletion
  • 111 votes to delete.
The second Daniel Brandt article deletion review
  • Approximately 111 supporting Overturning/keeping the article, and approximately 70 supporting Endorsement of the deletion/deleting at its closure by Thebainer.
The 13th Daniel Brandt Articles for Deletion, began 2 March 2007.
  • Approximately 107 Wikipedians supporting retaining the article, and approximately 39 supporting removal as of 6 March 2007.

[edit] Other

Jordanhill commemoration
  • 128 people voted "support" to make some sort of commemorative effort in the Jordanhill railway station, it being the location described in the 1,000,000th Wikipedia article.
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy
  • 202 Wikipedians supported the inclusion of the images of cartoons in the article
WikiProject Usability/Main Page
  • A double listing, 687 support changing the main page and 213 oppose.
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Sidebar redesign/Final draft vote
  • 189 votes supporting option 1 and 115 votes supporting option 3 (as this was an approval vote, some users voted for both).
User:Tim Starling/Get Well Soon
  • About 145