Talk:Timo Alakotila

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Timo Alakotila is part of WikiProject PipeOrgan which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's content relating to the pipe organ and its associated repertoire, organists, and other articles. If you would like to participate, you can edit Timo Alakotila, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Looking to help? Check out the to-do list: Get Pipe organ nearer to WP:FA status by adding references, and discuss moving some content to subpages (see also talk). Complete article tagging with {{PipeOrgan-project-page}} and add the articles to the Article list. nearly complete... Complete the organists category overhaul, in conjunction with above. See FAQs Copy edit organ pipe, flue pipe etc., see Mini-projects Copy edit organ stop Create article about the various types to windchest Add the new {{organist-stub}} to biographical articles either instead of, or additional to the {{Keyboardist-stub}} that currently exists. Add Category:Electronic organ manufacturing companies to List of organ builders.

Although there are more elegant articles than this one, I do not really understand why it is marked for cleanup. If I don't recieve a reason, I will remove the tag - it is not so useful when not explained. / Habj 02:35, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

It just needs some copyediting — I'm not sure how to explain it, but the wording doesn't look quite right. Possibly this is mostly nitpicking. ‣ᓛᖁᑐ 03:21, 9 November 2005 (UTC)