User talk:Tikitom9
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Erupt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Erupt.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] notability guidelines
Hello Tikitom9. This topic does not meet notability guidelines, in my personal opinion. I've excepted the wording below. But please use the links and read about it for yourself, and in greater depth, so that you know what guidelines apply. Obviously you can bring it up to standards. Otherwise, in my opinion, it may be eligible for deletion. Please see the except below:
| Notability and inclusion guidelines |
|---|
| Notability guidelines |
|
Academics |
| Active proposals |
| See also |
A topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself and each other. All topics must meet a minimum threshold of notability in order for an article on that topic to be included in Wikipedia. This requirement ensures that there exists enough source material to write a verifiable, encyclopedic article about the topic.
Notable here means "worthy of being noted"[1][2] or "attracting notice"[3]. It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance". It is not measured by Wikipedia editors' own subjective judgements. It is not "newsworthiness".
The guidelines in the table on the right have been created, or are under discussion, to set out more precisely some additional criteria in certain areas.
[edit] The primary notability criterion
One notability criterion shared by nearly all of the subject-specific notability guidelines, as well as Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not1, is the criterion that a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, reliable published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself.
The above excerpt from Wikipedia posted by Bus stop 15:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Tom Curtis (artist)
An editor has nominated Tom Curtis (artist), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Curtis (artist) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 15:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
