User talk:Tigerbronco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ellen Moceri, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Ellen Moceri. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Yanksox 21:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Mx lacrosse2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mx lacrosse2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Estabrook squabble
I have no long-term objection to deleting our largely unnecessary argument at Talk:Middlesex School, but I'd like to see the revisions made first. Once they're carried out, I wholeheartedly endorse deleting the whole thing. Still, are you really surprised that you wrote a section on a controversial topic and an NPOV debate ensued? --Venicemenace 20:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Never mind - I've decided to join you in yanking the debate. Considering you support East Fields development, I'm sure you will do a fine job of making the section NPOV. The whole Thoreau/Minutemen argument has long irritated me because I see it as specious and not really relevant to the true issue, and that's why I dove into the conversation in the first place. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to enjoy the weekend. Your favorite "middle aged" gadfly, --Venicemenace 02:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Estabrook woods3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Estabrook woods3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
