Talk:Thucydides/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
   1. Well written?: Good mechanics. Very few errors in spelling/grammar. Smooth transition between paragraphs and sentences.
   2. Factually accurate?: The article is factually accurate based on the references shown.
   3. Broad in coverage?: Though the article is somewhat short, thoroughness of content is evident.
   4. Neutral point of view?: The biases expressed in the sources are all expressed in the article.
   5. Article stability?: Stability evident.
   6. Images?: The article only has one image, which is more than enough for now.

The article "Thucydides" is a well-written and well-sourced article. Though the article does need a few more citations in order to become an A-class article, it is still good content-wise. Deucalionite 15:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/h/u/Talk%7EThucydides_Comments_c5a8.html"