User talk:Thordice
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<<unblock|I'm requesting to be unblocked. Myself and 12 people use this IP address at work to research Wikipedia articles and sometimes contribute to the website. I made sure that everyone contributes to their own articles and research and to avoid silly shadowclan sockpuppets because we cannot avoid to have them use pull strings or request us to have another ip ban. It's very important that we are able to use Wikipedia as a tool for research.
Thank you very much, Thordy aka Tor>>
Blake, just because this time you made 2 random edits, before jumping directly into the heat makes you think it isn't obvious to be once again you? Since once again you jump into all the topics that interests blake. How does it feel to live as a lying so-and-so? Can't you do better? Look as I've expressed I also don't like the Shadowclan guys actively working on the article about them, and forcing themselfs in collaberative effort into wikipedia (collaberative effort on their forums) and have expressed so, and hope in future they will respect it. But this does not change the fact of notability ruled by the wikipedia community. However creating a hand full of sockpuppets lieing and accusing, and trying as a clanmember to force your clan into wikipedia as well is not going to help it. If your subject you are closely affiliated with is notable, wait until someone finde the worries worth it to write about it, who isn't closely affiliated. By a rule of thumb: If you think if you would'nt do it, nobody else might think it worth it, its just not interesting enough for wikipedia. --Jestix 07:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Dear Jestix,
I do in fact know Blake and I will not lie about that. However I'm simply following the rules of Wikipedia and trying my best to only contribute to the website and not engage in silly debates or personal attacks made by shadowclan. They left an awful taste in my mouth when some members went so far as to send emails to Blake's family members about their surname. After recent discussion Blake feels he understands how do use wikipedia and will also avoid debates or personal attacks with Shadowclan.
If you notice my edits might directed as a cleanup for all of Blake's articles. However I hope you also notice I'm only commenting and providing more links, sources and possible noteworthy information. If they are still deleted, then so be it. At least they will have most of the facts or resources.
I think your going doing a good job by maintaining a neutral point of view. I read your comments on both Bloodclan and Shadowclan articles.
Thordice 15:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
If that would be indeed true, you are what we call a "Meatpuppet", thats is generally considered just to be as bad as a sockpuppet. --Jestix 17:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
That's your opinion and I would disagree. Thank you for your kind thoughts and comments Jestix. Thordice 21:14, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
This is not just my opinion, follow the link I gave and read yourself --Jestix 21:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
A meatpuppet is a variation of a sockpuppet; a new Internet community member account is created by another person at the request of a user solely for the purposes of influencing the community on a given issue or issues. While less overtly deceptive than sockpuppetry, the effect of meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry on the community as a whole may be similar.
Just take a break, cool down a bit, the ban on your blake911 account isn't forever. I don't know exactly how long they last, but its not forever. Wikipedia does not ban people because they never want to see them again, they ban them to give them a chance to get out of the heat, and just cool down a bit, wikipedia is not for fights. --Jestix 22:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm not Blake and I disagree with the meatpuppet comment. Please stop with the insults and thank you for your concern. Have a good day and enjoy your time on Wikipedia.
Thordice 23:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Samuel Van Leer
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Samuel Van Leer, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.vanleerplus.org/8samuel.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Samuel Van Leer. Then you should do both of the following:
-
- Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Samuel Van Leer where we can find that note; and
- Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL.
It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Garion96 (talk) 13:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
