Talk:Thomas W. Sneddon Jr.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Minor update following Jackson verdict.
- this page seems somewhat biased against Thomas Sneddon. Not that I disagree with anything , but there has to be at least something positive to say on his behalf. Quazywabbit 03:08, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
- Specifically, referring to his "grudge" as if it were an established fact, not having any citations, and not dealing substantively with the manner of prosecution contribute to its non-neutrality. I have no opinion on the case, only on the manner of presentation here. GMcGath 15:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)