User talk:Thenthornthing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Where's Who

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Where's Who, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Obina 22:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Service PR5 Exeter

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Service PR5 Exeter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. RHB ^{Talk - Edits} 18:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Service P1-P2 Exeter

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Service P1-P2 Exeter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. RHB ^{Talk - Edits} 20:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Service P Exeter

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Service P Exeter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. RHB ^{Talk - Edits} 20:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Cumbria train.jpg

Sam Blacketer 11:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Images

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:ServiceAExeter2.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:ServiceAExeter2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

Am tagging the images as they can't be presumed free unless it is stated by the authour. Though if you live in Exeter it might be an idea to go out with a camera and grab a few pictures, might try and take one myself when I get the chance 81.168.94.80 20:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC) ---- Above written by me, forgot to login --Enotayokel 20:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Emmerdale - Who Killed Tom King?

Hi, and thanks for your suport in making the new pageon Who Killed Tom King. I reccomended to user:Jennyplus (one of the main cointributer)that it be split into another section, to which she refused, i went ahead and done it, only to be reverted. So thanks for that, a great help Thenthornthing 11:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I really wanted more information on the murder thats why I wrote it up, but you were right it was too long and needed it's own page. Jameshdl 13:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: Your edits to Red Nose Day 2007

Hi, You may or may not be aware but you reverted back several edits by myself and other people so I've had to revert it back. You've shown disagreement only with the section headers however other edits were made since then, including tidying of the article to simplfy its readability, factual additions about the show and fixes to incorrect links to disambiguation. If you disagree with the titles I've used please discuss it on the discussion page (They are however encyclopedic as the terms were used during the show by the presenters) but please don't remove large amounts of other peoples work without discussing it first. Thanks. ~~ Peteb16 19:35, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, the reason, which i stated at the time was that the "funny" and "money" terms are unencyclapedicable, it was a decent format. As for the deletion of info; i put in my reverted edit, most of the newer infomation, and as far as i can see, i put back all of the text. So where you have got that from , i don't know ! Thenthornthing 23:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a comparison between your changes at 14:51 and 18:40, 14 of the 16 intermediate revisions that aren't shown (which means they were undone) are mine. There's little difference in the two revisions meaning very little of my revisions were saved. Your changes also retitled Bob Geldof (he isn't a sir as he's not British) and put Ricky Gervais back as making an appeal video which he didn't do (seriously anyway). I'm sorry, but I don't see any point where you put back any of the information you removed. I think we should leave this to rest now, however. There's no point in arguing about it if we're both happy with the article as it stands now. ~~ Peteb16 23:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)